Re: types of traffic in tcp congest control

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Mon, 13 May 2002 04:59 UTC

Message-ID: <3CDF481C.7000709@isi.edu>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 21:59:08 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.0.0+) Gecko/20020509
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: J Wu <jinw@comp.leeds.ac.uk>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=B4=F3=C0=EE?= <liy666@sina.com>, tcp-impl@lerc.nasa.gov
Subject: Re: types of traffic in tcp congest control
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205122354460.30118-100000@cslin135.leeds.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-tcp-impl@grc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 547
Lines: 18


J Wu wrote:
> Hi Li,
...
> 
> As my understanding of S.Low's paper that the mice stands for small scale
> transmition with delay sensitive and the elephant stands for large scale
> transmition. The small scale transmitions will not cause any congestion,
> but the large scale transmitions will. 

That is an assumption, one which other results, notably of bandwidth 
limited highly-shared core links (e.g., the US-UK link) refute. They 
indicate that mice can indeed cause congestion amongst themselves, even 
in the absence of elephants.

Joe