[tcpinc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-05.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 25 October 2016 09:16 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE00129499; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.36.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147738698237.15182.737003991605737119.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:16:22 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/3rRZAN6jfdR6MfsDGQUU9tSfqHE>
Cc: tcpinc@ietf.org
Subject: [tcpinc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-05.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:16:22 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the TCP Increased Security of the IETF. Title : TCP-ENO: Encryption Negotiation Option Authors : Andrea Bittau Dan Boneh Daniel B. Giffin Mark Handley David Mazieres Eric W. Smith Filename : draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-05.txt Pages : 27 Date : 2016-10-25 Abstract: Despite growing adoption of TLS [RFC5246], a significant fraction of TCP traffic on the Internet remains unencrypted. The persistence of unencrypted traffic can be attributed to at least two factors. First, some legacy protocols lack a signaling mechanism (such as a "STARTTLS" command) by which to convey support for encryption, making incremental deployment impossible. Second, legacy applications themselves cannot always be upgraded, requiring a way to implement encryption transparently entirely within the transport layer. The TCP Encryption Negotiation Option (TCP-ENO) addresses both of these problems through a new TCP option kind providing out-of-band, fully backward-compatible negotiation of encryption. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-05 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-05 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [tcpinc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-05.… internet-drafts