[tcpinc] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-13: (with COMMENT)

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-13: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for your work on this draft and experiment.  I just have one comment
that I don't think has been mentioned already. In section 4, could you include
reference to Opportunistic security, RFC7435.  The definition has changed
slightly over time and it would be good to link this to the current definition
that is intended.  The work on 7435 was painstaking and the definition varies a
bit in older specs.  I do realize you describe this more in the security
considerations section, but it is much later in the document, so this seemed
like an easy fix.