[tcpinc] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-13: (with COMMENT)
Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 11 November 2017 13:11 UTC
Return-Path: <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5176129505; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:11:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno@ietf.org, David Black <david.black@dell.com>, tcpinc-chairs@ietf.org, david.black@dell.com, tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.65.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151040587573.16080.12341649562855789524.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 05:11:15 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/7sAqB1uGV8a07SK63mAyqvr0d28>
Subject: [tcpinc] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-13: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Working group mailing list for TCP Increased Security \(tcpinc\)" <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 13:11:16 -0000
Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-13: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for your work on this draft and experiment. I just have one comment that I don't think has been mentioned already. In section 4, could you include reference to Opportunistic security, RFC7435. The definition has changed slightly over time and it would be good to link this to the current definition that is intended. The work on 7435 was painstaking and the definition varies a bit in older specs. I do realize you describe this more in the security considerations section, but it is much later in the document, so this seemed like an easy fix.
- [tcpinc] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-tc… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [tcpinc] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-iet… David Mazieres
- Re: [tcpinc] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-iet… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [tcpinc] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-iet… Kathleen Moriarty