[tcpinc] TCPINC status

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Wed, 29 March 2017 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30311293FC for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38uw60Rf4npx for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764581270AC for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id d10so20908468qke.1 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Lby0idJ0uUeMohIJv2T2Zxr9q87eAJ0W6dH/FDDjTsQ=; b=lnhVeNcGMipj2/ldwU+JQrbEdz10v7qoBKG7iU/2Te+mWi818YNffLl6zwHi1fvSAL 7OAc72TALYvmuJC/mKEWnmInFN5cVZOc0JU78g3sSkTqsu6+PjCqbySekZvVh1BN08kg FC5OJ5WfGsQ63TvaNQ3mBwKI5VXMxTXDzzIPo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Lby0idJ0uUeMohIJv2T2Zxr9q87eAJ0W6dH/FDDjTsQ=; b=jbarAalC3xg3SyiXJJNa7Xoib4CJit0ux7Emts4xB7gK578VuraH1dSrP6/3cOiMaP 5P3qA/OfwlbsBWnDiffwEOyph2yIQWCKd8vUXjfn/xACJJAiZ08iukkMP3XfTg9GcNXd Ha3+lXLxV2wRCtUT40s36Zqj2KLnYTYFkLhVlpW1maYrqvJycOmVDxwzdFc/HTOTNqG2 og5i8oytef6BgRV64OG5WAC1ttoEuTMak1yXNQGT/5UAj6UtgeQijJVsoMX10peGDVQi Bp8ymhOXzJ4MVE0oFZCPdEgYfJRxykwIxC+vlpi04v1Ntc7mBgrMBeFjsV8bbt2rx9+B tThw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1Z+0kqUealSXpJI+GIEKaouzDLV70Yu5Vjs32tcVGWOYSdxv01KAhO5p8MYqQy4bUec7CsQDICbrM9CA==
X-Received: by 10.55.11.207 with SMTP id 198mr2114419qkl.100.1490812432212; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:33:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.129.194 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [31.133.148.145]
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 13:33:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nWxKusfNwSaQrRrX3XXQvi5eig6aUUQi7zSNxnyK+Zc5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: saag@ietf.org, tcpinc <tcpinc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114c70b07330ab054be2d127
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/DLG9SFjbrO-YRIPwrCXfliofDak>
Subject: [tcpinc] TCPINC status
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Working group mailing list for TCP Increased Security \(tcpinc\)" <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:33:56 -0000

TCPINC is not meeting in Chicago.

We have just ended WGLC on the two main documents, TCP-ENO and tcpcrypt:

        https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno
        https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt

We are still looking for implementors, and also co-authors for a middlebox
probing document. Finally, there is still the abstract API draft in
development that probably needs more eyeballs from folks who have put
together similar documents in the past.

Kyle (for David Black)