[tcpinc] Call for adoption for draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno
Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> Tue, 15 September 2015 08:44 UTC
Return-Path: <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6CCA1ACCDF for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kz9Fz9rCYW-v for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch (smtp.ee.ethz.ch [129.132.2.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C161AC40A for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 01:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D92D9307 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:44:17 +0200 (MEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on smtp.ee.ethz.ch
Received: from smtp.ee.ethz.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.ee.ethz.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id X3HOTDLboiQj for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:44:17 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from [82.130.103.143] (nb-10510.ethz.ch [82.130.103.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mirjak) by smtp.ee.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4464D9302 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:44:17 +0200 (MEST)
To: tcpinc <tcpinc@ietf.org>
From: Mirja Kühlewind <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Message-ID: <55F7DA1B.8010703@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:43:07 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/ONgLfgZBDkTZsngqFesTAW2qpR8>
Subject: [tcpinc] Call for adoption for draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 08:44:22 -0000
Hi all, I'd like to start a call to ask for adoption as working group document of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-02. This is the third revision of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno addressing feedback provided on the list over the last couple of weeks. Based on this feedback and the thereby indicated interest of the working group in this work, I believe this document is ready to ask for adoption as a starting point to work on a tcp negotiation option (in a separate document for now). Please note that as always the adoption of this document does not mean that we have to publish it as it is, or publish it at all. The adoption only means that the working group is interested in continuing work on this approach now and that the change rights go over to the working group such that we can 'enforce' changes as a group based on consensus. Please indicate until Monday, Sep 28, 2015 if you support the adoption of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-02 as working group document of not. As the chair I consider draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno in scope for the charter. To adopt draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno it is necessary that I see enough interest and energy in the working group to follow on with this work. Therefore please simply indicate if you support this work. If you don't support this work, I as a chair would be grateful, if you could provide some reasoning for this. If there is enough energy to work on this document, I would only consider strong technical flaws or any comments that show that this work would be harmful for the goals of the working group as a reason to not adopt the document. Thanks to all! Mirja
- [tcpinc] Call for adoption for draft-bittau-tcpin… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [tcpinc] Call for adoption for draft-bittau-t… Derek Fawcus
- Re: [tcpinc] Call for adoption for draft-bittau-t… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [tcpinc] Call for adoption for draft-bittau-t… David Mazieres
- Re: [tcpinc] Call for adoption for draft-bittau-t… Kyle Rose
- [tcpinc] 2 days left: Call for adoption for draft… Mirja Kühlewind
- Re: [tcpinc] 2 days left: Call for adoption for d… Eric Smith
- Re: [tcpinc] 2 days left: Call for adoption for d… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [tcpinc] 2 days left: Call for adoption for d… Andrea Bittau