Re: [tcpinc] Kathleen Moriarty's Yes on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-13: (with COMMENT)

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:25 PM, David Mazieres expires 2018-02-10 PST
<[e-mail]>
wrote:
> Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]> writes:
>
>> I only suggested section 4 as that's where you first mention OS.  I
>> think it's important as one reads the draft to understand how you want
>> that read on first introduction.  The Security Considerations section
>> is really far down in the draft.  Do you want to add a pointer to the
>> security considerations from section 4 and in the security
>> considerations also point to RFC7435?
>>
>> That would also work for me if the pointer to RFC7435 isn't in section 4.
>
> If you want RFC7435 cited upfront, what about doing so in the design
> goals section (1.1)?  The first design goal could be extended to
> something like:
>
> 1. Enable endpoints to negotiate the use of a separately specified TCP
>    encryption protocol (_TEP_) suitable for either opportunistic
>    security [RFC7435] of arbitrary TCP communications or stronger
>    security of applications willing to perform endpoint authentication.

Perfect, thanks!  I think this will help the reader and I appreciate
you addressing the comment.

> David



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen