Re: [tcpinc] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Daniel B Giffin <dbg@scs.stanford.edu> Tue, 11 December 2018 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <dbg@scs.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771CC124D68; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:38:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=scs.stanford.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wJS_HD4Af8lJ; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:38:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (www.scs.stanford.edu [IPv6:2001:470:806d:1::9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E326E130E26; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:38:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.16.0.29/8.16.0.21) with ESMTP id wBBKcYGs068442; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:38:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=scs.stanford.edu; s=scs; t=1544560714; bh=Dh/5yTYwHW6npZrtsDv4c+NnWooIN21nM3DmxxxYqEE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To; b=Aa4yuJAneTjtfgIfYzujJj7CF1uZx9LcfY/C3SqHhLZOVh//KgcDKLD+7nfyZt03f lZh4dIEuU1eK3bfa2uf93HPmoWllX2GSEWumDr3h/RPGxx05G8XMFMbE42e3ZeYSkD J2feTYUcIZc4NC1u+SpIwKWyZK54wYrpe0XHXxys=
Received: (from dbg@localhost) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.16.0.29/8.16.0.29/Submit) id wBBKcYeM084643; Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:38:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 12:38:34 -0800
From: Daniel B Giffin <dbg@scs.stanford.edu>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: tcpinc <tcpinc@ietf.org>, Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, tcpinc-chairs@ietf.org, mazieres-nj788xtv7k4q4yq2nedg4eupms@temporary-address.scs.stanford.edu, "Black, David" <David.Black@dell.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20181211203834.GA79853@scs.stanford.edu>
References: <CAJU8_nUeTj2fwr4PAJ1T34uACHK=OnX1_OC3+UB9DomcvvcPMw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPe5_UhhmhiSBMGqYTfT7pyVhaeWXBOkw7CHRumghN57Q@mail.gmail.com> <8736skgjot.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CABcZeBO6HRTCfkcNivnagjpxOhEvEvC5WeKFXOhdcHAnCc1tFw@mail.gmail.com> <87a7mp9din.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CABcZeBNHxqU0k+jK61zTKoUmuY2V9tcgEZM9Y=R5RkciZjnXtQ@mail.gmail.com> <20181108211936.GA38291@scs.stanford.edu> <CABcZeBP_x91zXJv-F07ptxSduwWq-7va=_hpwW8J1sgDKMh5pA@mail.gmail.com> <20181129184122.GA26520@scs.stanford.edu> <CABcZeBP2Q+i2N4_+T-KRLR-XtDJiUREpU8V9kUAVTsCwm-D=kQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBP2Q+i2N4_+T-KRLR-XtDJiUREpU8V9kUAVTsCwm-D=kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/ch6YguaqSjh7ZdYbSUsATvjnyc4>
Subject: Re: [tcpinc] Eric Rescorla's Discuss on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Working group mailing list for TCP Increased Security \(tcpinc\)" <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:38:38 -0000

Eric Rescorla wrote:
> SGTM.

Okay great, I've posted a new draft with that change:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt/

Here is the diff:

  https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-15.txt

daniel