IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpinc] Review of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-01

Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi> Mon, 24 August 2015 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9B71A1B27 for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4uezF-qnJXzJ for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC2951A8761 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 07:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LK-Perkele-VII (a91-155-194-207.elisa-laajakaista.fi [91.155.194.207]) by emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A67A18876C; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:29:48 +0300 (EEST)
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 17:29:48 +0300
From: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150824142948.GA23716@LK-Perkele-VII>
References: <87wpwmnenv.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0cnq9cZdkn=yp8-GJfXDGMP8r1sib3qrQQEQYhF25kYZPg@mail.gmail.com> <87twrpokpz.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0ck2PfKQ8pkDLiSmuLH+81s2GzsBnKYH7e=5ga5nSJvo1Q@mail.gmail.com> <87io85ofkl.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0cmna07KzCZme7pxRgCcAOJLXzup3KPJ+bRimL=n3mpPXg@mail.gmail.com> <87vbc5l8si.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0c=cLj2F6JyFX848D1TuDt0A=kT7UMm8ZPRRu-X6ow4oTQ@mail.gmail.com> <87d1ycizeo.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0c=SRaUR9okBAXaKBZG0wZ12h7aarxPFf7LYCtcQfG-nJg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0c=SRaUR9okBAXaKBZG0wZ12h7aarxPFf7LYCtcQfG-nJg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: Ilari Liusvaara <ilari.liusvaara@elisanet.fi>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/gjfgiP4OECTYENSRy43r7ZYIvAo>
Cc: tcpinc <tcpinc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpinc] Review of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-01
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:31:29 -0000

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 07:22:23AM -0700, Watson Ladd wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:33 AM, David Mazieres
> 
> This is a misreading: I'm proposing that at any time there is only one
> suite that everyone uses, and versioning is just for transitions.

This becomes highly problematic when one needs to:
- Support multiple security levels.
- There isn't one technically (meaning, ignore legal constraints)
  superrior algorithm.


-Ilari

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email