Re: [tcpinc] Consensus call: questions posed at the Berlin session
Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Mon, 25 July 2016 17:39 UTC
Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE13E12D14A for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xedZp-hDhYyF for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1114612D572 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9939EF98B; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:39:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EB6002013C; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 18:28:19 +0200 (CEST)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, tcpinc <tcpinc@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nUAvgOzOxrq03YOnZDBBKiqSQN_m53UTBdd4PC8MAF=wA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJU8_nUAvgOzOxrq03YOnZDBBKiqSQN_m53UTBdd4PC8MAF=wA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22+77~gaba8744 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:28:19 -0400
Message-ID: <8737mxlm1o.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/jjSc10podJ90hVzm7IydySBskmw>
Subject: Re: [tcpinc] Consensus call: questions posed at the Berlin session
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:39:29 -0000
On Mon 2016-07-25 07:29:23 -0400, Kyle Rose wrote:
> Here is a list of questions posed at the Berlin session, along with the
> rough consensus established among those in the room. Please respond to each
> by number if you were not in attendance and have an opinion, especially if
> that differs from the meeting consensus, indicated by a * after each
> question.
Does this mean that the chairs do not want e-mailed responses from
people who were in attendance?
--dkg
- Re: [tcpinc] Consensus call: questions posed at t… Black, David
- Re: [tcpinc] Consensus call: questions posed at t… Kyle Rose
- Re: [tcpinc] Consensus call: questions posed at t… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- [tcpinc] Consensus call: questions posed at the B… Kyle Rose