[tcpinc] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Sat, 11 November 2017 06:32 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt@ietf.org, Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, tcpinc-chairs@ietf.org, krose@krose.org, tcpinc@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151038195719.16096.10304916264269485497.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:32:37 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/kilNg9UJ8BnXKzbBv_ZW5gGQqG0>
Subject: [tcpinc] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In section 3.3, the last bullet: Why are the SHOULDs not MUSTs? Do you envision
times where it might make sense not refresh an ephemeral public key, or write
one to persistent storage?

[tcpinc] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-tcpinc-… Ben Campbell
Re: [tcpinc] Ben Campbell's Yes on draft-ietf-tcp… Daniel B Giffin