IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpinc] Review of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-01

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Mon, 24 August 2015 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523EF1B2B65 for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5Zw_VOWSFPIC for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x230.google.com (mail-qk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F34C51B2B2E for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qkbm65 with SMTP id m65so89027314qkb.2 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FZ3b03brFY4ZjBdy7h/sFaToAiNCl+TydULQ3QhPhKU=; b=SPcy+29dR4FnILjF+h41wM9fz+PZ+OiJO5SV60gbhPouUEMwO9zeoDompHvp38oVCi cA/+trGBJ7WWp+wYTJfHQLiS1g0JWYFKMwAK6ZFzDayLd6k0pzX59KWteYBe7hxaNys6 KOmVsaXLDGeJvG1NYxRcqLOFJTc5CxzvTk/QnAyXOzmeeYZqhStu4kmYdfgqn2+pJpxn iExN9w6dP2XApmrPcrgplw7jrgMnHYH8zFgNv86MNWmghcnoEz8xByVxTuEsZOYj9BVk CD12enH3iEAK+939nQ5/NeAJ+b5L7t/eo2Gbrca/2VP2GYZhsYb+aWG2IMr10qBhle5T qUtg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.49.200 with SMTP id x191mr32858455ywx.56.1440451445243; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.129.133.130 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0ckqcprHGG=hQkrZ-_VpUVFf9g6stK_A3ywcre=PmPsT+A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBNEFVkDi38y3G-C2nQF=dzW2mGDsj5DVK_OKVkPwK=G0g@mail.gmail.com> <878u92oadf.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0ckQskjLqo0=YfJrmBEsyCaq0jpcSzGUwKhRo0BzzQ=wDA@mail.gmail.com> <871teuo7nu.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0ckn-QdoXmTgjW8gYQyVqZ0x9JHEYvZO5VHQkG9nKA3-Ew@mail.gmail.com> <87wpwmnenv.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0cnq9cZdkn=yp8-GJfXDGMP8r1sib3qrQQEQYhF25kYZPg@mail.gmail.com> <87twrpokpz.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0ck2PfKQ8pkDLiSmuLH+81s2GzsBnKYH7e=5ga5nSJvo1Q@mail.gmail.com> <87io85ofkl.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0cmna07KzCZme7pxRgCcAOJLXzup3KPJ+bRimL=n3mpPXg@mail.gmail.com> <87vbc5l8si.fsf@ta.scs.stanford.edu> <CACsn0c=cLj2F6JyFX848D1TuDt0A=kT7UMm8ZPRRu-X6ow4oTQ@mail.gmail.com> <55DB79BC.8040309@bbn.com> <55DB8338.4060403@cs.tcd.ie> <CACsn0ckqcprHGG=hQkrZ-_VpUVFf9g6stK_A3ywcre=PmPsT+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 14:24:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CABkgnnV8VtcEgaKNEWGo-oJ0vV5VY-qJbHSRX1woztQdh9FfEA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/m4Gy0lgO7oP70IOC5enyeE62mZQ>
Cc: tcpinc <tcpinc@ietf.org>, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Subject: Re: [tcpinc] Review of draft-bittau-tcpinc-tcpeno-01
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 21:24:07 -0000

On 24 August 2015 at 14:20, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:
> So this protocol negotiates how to negotiate?


That's my read on it.  That's a natural consequence of layering.  You
can make your own assessment about whether that is too much, but in
this case, I don't think that it is.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email