[tcpinc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-06.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon, 31 October 2016 22:34 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6966C129B17; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:34:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.37.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147795326642.23154.17804152737838048115.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:34:26 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/pbjg3cQvWs37qJI_18ZZ3HofWMc>
Cc: tcpinc@ietf.org
Subject: [tcpinc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-06.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:34:26 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the TCP Increased Security of the IETF.
Title : TCP-ENO: Encryption Negotiation Option
Authors : Andrea Bittau
Dan Boneh
Daniel B. Giffin
Mark Handley
David Mazieres
Eric W. Smith
Filename : draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-06.txt
Pages : 27
Date : 2016-10-31
Abstract:
Despite growing adoption of TLS [RFC5246], a significant fraction of
TCP traffic on the Internet remains unencrypted. The persistence of
unencrypted traffic can be attributed to at least two factors.
First, some legacy protocols lack a signaling mechanism (such as a
"STARTTLS" command) by which to convey support for encryption, making
incremental deployment impossible. Second, legacy applications
themselves cannot always be upgraded, requiring a way to implement
encryption transparently entirely within the transport layer. The
TCP Encryption Negotiation Option (TCP-ENO) addresses both of these
problems through a new TCP option kind providing out-of-band, fully
backward-compatible negotiation of encryption.
The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno/
There's also a htmlized version available at:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-06
A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-06
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [tcpinc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-06.… internet-drafts