[tcpinc] New tcpcrypt draft with minor fixes

Daniel B Giffin <dbg@scs.stanford.edu> Mon, 13 March 2017 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dbg@scs.stanford.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F869129458 for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WRU3RIudonMT for <tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (www.scs.stanford.edu [IPv6:2001:470:806d:1::9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6594129415 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from market.scs.stanford.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2DMWt73029316 for <tcpinc@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dbg@localhost) by market.scs.stanford.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2DMWtE0046689 for tcpinc@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 15:32:55 -0700
From: Daniel B Giffin <dbg@scs.stanford.edu>
To: tcpinc <tcpinc@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170313223255.GA55843@scs.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/qJn5Rj4qK2oxMC2nNSn0swc09eQ>
Subject: [tcpinc] New tcpcrypt draft with minor fixes
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Working group mailing list for TCP Increased Security \(tcpinc\)" <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:32:57 -0000

We've submitted another tcpcrypt draft with minor fixes:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt/

In particular, this draft makes clear that when a host
receives a "rekey" frame from its peer, it should respond
with its own rekey frame ONLY if it has not already
transmitted a FIN.

Also, the author-count has been reduced from eight to six
(and those omitted have been named as Contributors).

daniel