[tcpinc] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12: (with COMMENT)

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 25 October 2017 22:53 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno@ietf.org, David Black <david.black@dell.com>, tcpinc-chairs@ietf.org, david.black@dell.com, tcpinc@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150897203310.24076.10245438696983137497.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:53:53 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/t4hWSX7HlpwOkfPkdoTFVEdk6KU>
Subject: [tcpinc] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12: (with COMMENT)

Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpeno/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I would appreciate a paragraph/few sentences that explain the relationship of TCP-ENO to
TCPC-AO.  Obviously, this is for encryption and that is for authentication - but issues around
the algorithms and keying seem like they would be related.

[tcpinc] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-t… Alia Atlas