[tcpinc] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 10 November 2017 08:50 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt@ietf.org, Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, tcpinc-chairs@ietf.org, krose@krose.org, tcpinc@ietf.org, wangzitao@huawei.com
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151030381876.29951.5493226784893679063.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:50:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/y_oMo2iliWeFdCViMr6yZucWsPk>
Subject: [tcpinc] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Nothing against the publication of this document but ... as for any
experimental RFCs, we must describe the criteria for a successful experiment
(evaluation)?

[tcpinc] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ie… Benoit Claise
Re: [tcpinc] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draf… Daniel B Giffin
Re: [tcpinc] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draf… Benoit Claise