[tcpinc] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: (with COMMENT)
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 10 November 2017 08:50 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tcpinc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tcpinc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCD412EC05; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:50:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt@ietf.org, Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, tcpinc-chairs@ietf.org, krose@krose.org, tcpinc@ietf.org, wangzitao@huawei.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.65.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151030381876.29951.5493226784893679063.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:50:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpinc/y_oMo2iliWeFdCViMr6yZucWsPk>
Subject: [tcpinc] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tcpinc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "Working group mailing list for TCP Increased Security \(tcpinc\)" <tcpinc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpinc/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpinc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc>, <mailto:tcpinc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 08:50:19 -0000
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpinc-tcpcrypt/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Nothing against the publication of this document but ... as for any experimental RFCs, we must describe the criteria for a successful experiment (evaluation)?
- [tcpinc] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ie… Benoit Claise
- Re: [tcpinc] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draf… Daniel B Giffin
- Re: [tcpinc] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draf… Benoit Claise