[tcpm] [Result] WG item adoption for draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-06

[Yoshifumi Nishida <[e-mail]>]

Hello,

Thanks for providing feedback on WG item adoption for draft-scharf-tcpm-ya
ng-tcp-06.
After some discussions among the chairs (to be precise: Michael Tuexen and
me because Michael Scharf has a conflict of interest),
we concluded supporting this draft is our rough consensus. Hence, we
decided to adopt it as a WG item.

As we have seen some discussions on the doc, we notice this would not be an
unanimous opinion in the community.
However, we will have plenty of chances for discussions until it's
published.
If there's any concerns on the doc, it should be clarified and solved by
then.

We really appreciate your cooperation.
--
Yoshi on behalf of tcpm co-chairs

On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 1:04 AM Yoshifumi Nishida <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The chairs has been discussing how to proceed
> draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-06 after the WG meeting.
> The results of the hum were a bit weak to see clear consensus although
> there was slightly strong hum for adoption.
> Also, there seems to be some confusions during the adoption call. (I'm
> sorry for the clumsiness of using the tool)
> In order for this, we would like to seek the additional feedback from the
> community on the following points.
>
> 1: If you want to add your hum to the call because you didn't at the
> meeting for some reasons or if you want to change your hum, please let the
> chairs know.
> 2: if you hummed for not adopting the draft, please share your opinion.
> This will be a very helpful input for us.
>
> We'll appreciate your cooperation.
> Thanks,
> --
> Yoshi
>