Re: [tcpm] rfc5961 and suggested updates.

Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com> Tue, 11 September 2018 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <loganaden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204D21310CA for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8fifY81bqtjv for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44B72127332 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id q4-v6so3081453iob.8 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mo4LnNx8PquPQ72bf7ihQz4/Ji0un3Ksuh4kj9VrTGQ=; b=O5Kxs8coO2PXhizRsVjczvQ/0tUv0HqU2wQHJuOPnp+EFW/X+JlpzTGce0/mnADyoC UZIt7a58a8GY0YCQbjORU1s7sGTx2xWjYYBiCNz4aZFxrN2YvgHjIi11EhcWEvaO9lOc QJfW9RY8L9Xcxoc7XQMjCT00eXpYt6dJ3WAZqNnVXxV6LNn9Y49I2xVOL6o63lJK1CuV b6xfhQmsG96tUjiZXLJVXsFDY0n7PvoT7PTgJ0WoYp539l//mx7Wm8FzTgQvJzeYTjAH Z99cUuuaD6+fN7Ni+35YtBNplvvphwVuMuAhG6J36E1XISvfZPb6ZMWs9kapKTt7+uRq 83tw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mo4LnNx8PquPQ72bf7ihQz4/Ji0un3Ksuh4kj9VrTGQ=; b=RS3R5sAlzSNQDwiyToa6XUpMBla0pRCvVpl2MHYPL/he81587URQzvR8pxUTGlOISM ghTg/dXh5LMKP1HgXHpVS5xoGfPs38C29yyo/Wtk2v6ZVKQxBf82nnGi86UDMre3egWA Bn7PAvV5owPNQbM6y5QWFsktCxZ4VvH7TU397BX9bAA2rkedoI8S7hodi0EkWnDDcXLk FXygVnjkoTpU2JUCSbXAeAl9J3ueDp378VgsxJ0jhdzEdiWjWW36tvfQpl1aMo/Nv6B0 KO8WKL/f1juCYzLjgVMrlyCJeDSvEDxCb9WQAHMFzL53sDY78KeSEAKEl+clKQM0H04w uzyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51AanAO7D4So3zlFNNdvaWcwNHJnTAqv5sAq+fAh7wF9b5AlNVdZ dCyaNpBYnrPdrgGIZSxcdq9aQJ98uUK2+Gh7CxY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vda0KbJMms/a55HjkLAdZGOqJbeVp/s+UB983RzNbg7Uxmmt0t3IddAWGaue0joJ/i9RujG1+AHWXzlQv+0UiYo=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c586:: with SMTP id v128-v6mr19875704iof.7.1536661011631; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4f:f741:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 03:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <DDE6A9C1-3FED-4F0A-84F1-355FA2EBFCF1@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
References: <CAOp4FwQqfJh6QiNbtcaH83gbZm+iPK5zpTCvje0W+Tpz+fjNng@mail.gmail.com> <DDE6A9C1-3FED-4F0A-84F1-355FA2EBFCF1@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:16:51 +0400
Message-ID: <CAOp4FwQEP8MWkvqr9GCvD_6V3woPTUyxsBEh1KeuZs-tMpz5Bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch>
Cc: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/115OWI1ux73uiwlKp57xCno6DXw>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] rfc5961 and suggested updates.
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:16:55 -0000

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 6:07 PM, Mirja Kühlewind
<mirja.kuehlewind@tik.ee.ethz.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my personal opinion:
>
> I agree that documenting the problem and recommending the implementation of per-socket limits would be a useful thing to do.
>
> I don’t think it is appropriated or needed to update or even deprecate/ RFC5961, therefore I would strongly support the changes to this draft as you described below.
>
> Mirja
>

Thank you Mirja.

I have updated the I-D, and removed all texts which suggested updates
or deprecation of RFC5961. Feedback/opinions welcomed:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lvelvindron-ack-throttling-03