IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] TCP persist state issue.

"Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com> Tue, 01 July 2008 05:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72DEB3A6B23; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:45:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3CF3A67D7 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.718
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.718 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.881, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bq86d22vwP5G for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2793A6782 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,730,1204531200"; d="scan'208";a="120766277"
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jun 2008 22:45:56 -0700
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m615jumW011962; Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:45:56 -0700
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m615juTG012966; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 05:45:56 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.176]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:45:56 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 22:44:56 -0700
Message-ID: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58056ADBFB@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58056ADBF7@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: TCP persist state issue.
Thread-Index: AcjbPOw31GAccW+CR1uFnpdk6j4MxgAAB4TA
References: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58056ADBF7@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
From: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
To: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jul 2008 05:45:56.0126 (UTC) FILETIME=[BB42BBE0:01C8DB3D]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1365; t=1214891156; x=1215755156; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=ananth@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Anantha=20Ramaiah=20(ananth)=22=20<ananth@cisco .com> |Subject:=20TCP=20persist=20state=20issue. |Sender:=20; bh=UZD8lEvU5cCkYuEQj9dnbj4j3MN/zzUatBAdFjWUVAM=; b=oIyN3ynw/khsOuzcmnVeWFhkjG6Ew6TJ71Hf7bANz0dNCUlN8FgNuUJ69i aGouh5EwLVZJxM1STxBb9ClV5ZJ54aPlYKRxNuudCkEx9zdgm41dJIuUhMFs rQGqsqIORk;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=ananth@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
Cc: weddy@grc.nasa.gov, David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>
Subject: [tcpm] TCP persist state issue.
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

 
Typed too fast, this time adding the subject line. Sorry about that.

Thanks,
-Anantha
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)
> Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 10:40 PM
> To: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG
> Cc: David Borman; weddy@grc.nasa.gov
> Subject: [tcpm] (no subject)
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The persist state issue draft
> [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mahesh-persist-timeout-02] 
> which was discussed in the mailing list last year, is now 
> re-written into 2 separate drafts, the first one which 
> clarifies the RFC 1122 verbiage surrounding the zero window 
> probes and the second one which talks about the solutions in 
> detail. This was done in response to the WG suggestions 
> (which included David Borman and Mark Allman).
> 
> You can find the copy of the first draft at :
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-00.txt.
> Comments welcome.
> 
> The second draft which is also informational, talks about the 
> possible mitigations to the persist condition and will be 
> posted at a later time.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Anantha
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> 
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status