[tcpm] tcp-security: More feedback requested for the document outline

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Wed, 09 September 2009 05:59 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396B43A6A8F for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:59:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.335, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mm6YeK6O3gkw for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:59:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net (smtp1.xmundo.net [201.216.232.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434163A681B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 22:59:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]) by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89056B67D5; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 02:59:56 -0300 (ART)
Received: from [192.168.0.167] (129-130-17-190.fibertel.com.ar [190.17.130.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n895xmhi002337; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 02:59:49 -0300
Message-ID: <4AA74452.7060409@gont.com.ar>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:59:46 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]); Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:59:56 -0300 (ART)
Cc: "tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [tcpm] tcp-security: More feedback requested for the document outline
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 05:59:21 -0000

Folks,

The original deadline for commenting on the document outline is over.
These are the comments so far:

* Joe: wants to change the outline from the current outline (which
basically analyzes TCP on a "per-protocol-field",
"per-protocol-mechanism" basis, etc.) to an outline that basically
analyzes TCP on a "per-attack" basis (his proposal is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm/current/msg04838.html)

* Wesley: would like to change the outline as proposed by Joe, but could
live without doing that.

* Alfred: wants to leave the outline as is

* Fernando: wants to leave the outline as is

* Toby: wants to change the outline as proposed by Joe

I don't personally see clear consensus for changing the outline (even
less if we consider that many more people had agreed to accept the
document "as is").

However, as there have not been that many opinions about the outline, I
think it would be a good idea if wg participants that have not yet
voiced their opinion regarding the document outline have another chance
to do it.

So let's set a new deadline for this second round off-comments: if you
have any comments regarding the document outline, please voice your
opinion till September 16th (Wednesday), 2009.

Thanks!

Kind regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1