[tcpm] WGLC: comments on 2581bis

Gorry Fairhurst <gf@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Mon, 03 December 2007 02:21 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iz0w8-0008UN-Ot; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:21:32 -0500
Received: from tcpm by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iz0w7-0008UF-Gj for tcpm-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:21:31 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iz0w7-0008U4-6Z for tcpm@ietf.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:21:31 -0500
Received: from dee.erg.abdn.ac.uk ([139.133.204.82] helo=erg.abdn.ac.uk) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iz0w6-0003NG-H2 for tcpm@ietf.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 21:21:30 -0500
Received: from dhcp-4669.ietf70.org (dhcp-4669.ietf70.org [130.129.70.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by erg.abdn.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id lB32Kt1K022238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Dec 2007 02:20:59 GMT
Message-ID: <47536805.5050804@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:20:53 -0800
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gf@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mallman@icir.org, tcpm@ietf.org, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
References: <20071127004720.GD3385@hut.isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20071127004720.GD3385@hut.isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ERG-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ERG-MailScanner-From: gf@erg.abdn.ac.uk
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Cc:
Subject: [tcpm] WGLC: comments on 2581bis
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

I have a few comments/questions...

---
1) SMSS
- I think the document should also refer to PLPMTUD as a valid 
IETF-specified way to choose a segment size.
---
2) RMSS
- The wording in the draft is not clear  whether this is an upper bound 
to the SMSS, or just one of many ways to discover a sensible SMSS.
- Is the default RMSS still 536 bytes also for IPv6, since [RFC1122]
does not apply in this context to IPv6.
---
3) ECN
- The document speaks only of loss, but I'm assuming that this applies
equally to ECN. If that is so, perhaps we should explicitly say so up-front.
---

My other comments duplicated some of those already sent:-)

Gorry



_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm