IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Moving forward draft-touch-sne on independent stream?

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 29 November 2021 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026F63A09B6; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:12:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i3iDkgFeG7Ot; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com (mail-qv1-xf31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE9783A09B7; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:12:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id b11so15869817qvm.7; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:12:44 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GlU8ED+MswhTNLI48oueGUME46wkuGPjJCw64Lkj3+M=; b=FKRQk0BoyPfiiFhkFBApjMbfQqYgnddD6YuDXgbmXppezBVSC1cbcrjGjqc/qdasf+ inKVewWZsJSom//b5nV8Polxp8M3FRk+dl4F27kYfRwaGs52WM9yS+DoDCX6adzrcNi4 91rWJuyHLJx14UmAR9LzCe2VkEB1An3EsqIKlJ2n10Uv2VvfhYpbdphnSMWGQKuwUzeU dFMySHfgaHeLxEbOm0hwAvJ2JoSxCvH3k1dtv2DvihraYhXnar3ya07ODt7xT3sN2t+/ e4v8c2OmU+oYoVI/KvhAJC2dRZDraKLhnDrEfKHlXmDDBrhafWZ4qzvbQtMsSr/m23Bi 4L9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GlU8ED+MswhTNLI48oueGUME46wkuGPjJCw64Lkj3+M=; b=Wt6gItWXHi1etV6B1EUvh87kG8j8CUoPo0jjrYTA5KauGs7DzOXL9jfLpI7W+kug4j S9tGsb+Dh/Z5qFrisT506c0QA0O0q4ov03QHlRbWnagTF12WEoomXLES69lK2JO+SDdA mPI9CMRzfzKX8YWGukWSPPuxMcqjwb7cpI8CambvY9UEo188sLcrZtOR0KLdshqhNNu5 PnKJ+KSUzWEm4jVhkMbSBz90L364m0qoq2GGXbVS7p3AEOgh7rVjfT0n88Mz0MJQ/NyV 8+51AhqTI48++SdircAHYKzHRN2cF17CEaRStNZDNZl4Zkqlo15tn9N9Posf5vbERChL pcxQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531BdOTxDrr0ka/E/F4lMDCnvYJquUlaYHV3/hb2jN3zja4DPEqW 2Gu2jU2pIMRZkc+zs55x1zwZ8FR3KubE9bqBvfpdfV/+
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyvlxDt2SPzFTkyUuWeIWk4v4tNrEYvYK4HsaORI70Vp5a1VUcOzHbIhEybz/+g838cwVy2Pj106rqMCdI1M4A=
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:528d:: with SMTP id v13mr32756588qvr.100.1638220362389; Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:12:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8de93237209d4fc7ab062bbc24217999@hs-esslingen.de> <CAM4esxSKH_QTsVb5-nLOxVY3_f8-=wxhhutrkdWR2btH0njciA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAK044QNMxToQ_ZJVKhSbtje0SvpKJkvcyw9L8-_D1asJ1hPhQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxSRxYftaag2vnyUuoohV+7PsO10LD0Xo7mFyzaETWZUDQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxSRxYftaag2vnyUuoohV+7PsO10LD0Xo7mFyzaETWZUDQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:12:31 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAK044S3vnD67C1nr6og_j=aTmLtqEL8epaa2YNDAv3uygYx-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Cc: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c39afd05d1f3e66c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/2jEvobLLBXBUYTDd0UuHW7rZxs0>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Moving forward draft-touch-sne on independent stream?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 21:12:49 -0000

Oh. I'm very sorry for it. I mistook it as a different one.
--
Yoshi

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 1:04 PM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:

> SYN option space is not the subject of the draft.
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:29 PM Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> This is just my opinion as an individual contributor.
>> I prefer to discuss this draft in the WG more rather than publishing it
>> as an IS.
>> I think SYN option space extension is an important feature for TCP's
>> future, so I think it would be better to have a standardized solution for
>> it.
>> Also, I don't see strong benefits to publish it for now.
>> --
>> Yoshi
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:29 AM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The conflict review is now in my inbox, and we will discuss it on
>>> December 2nd. If there are any concerns about this, please say so
>>> immediately.
>>>
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 1:05 PM Scharf, Michael <
>>> Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Joe has submitted draft-touch-sne to the ISE asking for publication of
>>>> an RFC on the Independent Stream. (Background: An RFC on Independent Stream
>>>> is not an IETF standard.)
>>>>
>>>> Publication on independent stream would be possible provided that the
>>>> document does not conflict with TCPM or other IETF work. An obvious
>>>> alternative would be homing the document in TCPM (or TSVWG) as an official
>>>> WG item - but this is not what is currently proposed.
>>>>
>>>> A link to the document is:
>>>>
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-touch-sne
>>>>
>>>> Note that the current header field "TCPM" would have to be replaced in
>>>> the further publication process, as documents on the independent stream are
>>>> not the outcome of an IETF WG.
>>>>
>>>> The TCPM chairs have reviewed draft-touch-sne. Our current
>>>> understanding that there would be no harm caused by such an independent
>>>> stream publication. As far as RFC 5925 is affected, we assume that an
>>>> Errata would be possible and sufficient.
>>>>
>>>> Before we get back to the ISE regarding this document, we would like to
>>>> cross-check whether our understanding is indeed the TCPM consensus:
>>>>
>>>> Are there any concerns inside the TCPM community regarding a
>>>> publication of draft-touch-sne draft-touch-sne on independent stream? If
>>>> so, please speak up!
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Michael
>>>> on behalf of all chairs
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> tcpm mailing list
>>>> tcpm@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>>>>
>>>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email