IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] rfc5961 and suggested updates.

Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Fri, 05 October 2018 23:52 UTC

Return-Path: <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08729130EAC for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 16:52:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ASeOOGEDMaB for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 16:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp [IPv6:2001:200:0:8803:203:178:142:146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80BF4130DD7 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 16:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-f181.google.com (mail-it1-f181.google.com [209.85.166.181]) by mail.sfc.wide.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED3F6278460 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 08:52:03 +0900 (JST)
Received: by mail-it1-f181.google.com with SMTP id q70-v6so4804090itb.3 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 16:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfogrPZgvr7AcH7gsNPs0uKWPS47n0AQq5FyaYf5DRoI4DpXBQUwK meZFhEb/EyRdRB0iXg0p0nL8XRH+/xEogfFEEpY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV61nHXfjGPnrhL5rFccm4j+lsv0p8BHBkuOjh4VVeSnBpzipkzPtcYSCmSw0rqmQpHmQdV79P8efZv12/H45xqI=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:f30f:: with SMTP id t15-v6mr9722811ith.95.1538783522713; Fri, 05 Oct 2018 16:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOp4FwQqfJh6QiNbtcaH83gbZm+iPK5zpTCvje0W+Tpz+fjNng@mail.gmail.com> <DDE6A9C1-3FED-4F0A-84F1-355FA2EBFCF1@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <CAOp4FwQ26SChQtPZ84aGZSYx6kfBChHkff54sqWNy4iMbeHg-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CALvgte-JDaKczpa_WYHNxzDJ7m2Yz3KRGxBgEuj2k0x76p2XTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOp4FwRWmuh=RtHA9mULOt3XBGN_thK3FiTVRkBLK1XWKH4N+g@mail.gmail.com> <CADVnQymo0GD-K9QdOcTHZ2X6D-JozXV4_sX06U1Q=UjCoaSuWg@mail.gmail.com> <91E0378A-354A-41A0-A1A9-C888AD4E0178@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <91E0378A-354A-41A0-A1A9-C888AD4E0178@strayalpha.com>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 16:51:49 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAO249yeRV8Wnuv+5LMRCQnTcpirqyS8sARaaF-3EgcaYejDbrA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAO249yeRV8Wnuv+5LMRCQnTcpirqyS8sARaaF-3EgcaYejDbrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: touch@strayalpha.com
Cc: ncardwell=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org, edumazet@google.com, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000041fa36057783f56d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/2qmqhfXpPQqaNIQiz74clx2z_tU>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] rfc5961 and suggested updates.
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 23:52:21 -0000

Just in case..
The errata 4772 https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4772 has mentioned
this issue and 793bis already refers it.
--
Yoshi

On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 5:30 PM Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:

> FWIW, that makes the most sense to me.
>
> On Oct 4, 2018, at 9:42 AM, Neal Cardwell <
> ncardwell=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Re:
>  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lvelvindron-ack-throttling-03
>
> I would support the suggestion to publish these recommendations (for
> per-connection rather than per-IP-address rate limiting) as an errata
> to RFC5961.
>
> neal
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email