IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-09

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 16 March 2021 21:51 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4BC3A108B; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.281
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HAS_X_OUTGOING_SPAM_STAT=2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WzebIwwB6wYe; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26F6A3A1078; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lr1CzqXhOJGBfnfsjJJocYEobTZmoCrU6nJtplxuJFs=; b=v4BqQKylPZag4pxoibUos72Mp 21US/EQXpaDaM4SUiVOZJuGKuG5eG3fTtEz2Pv3kT8lSXdzTemaAGD1a5f5tQfebqNyPjYFUHdhch c0qEugM90REzj2CLw6G4yphDZhpt2Y7cjzZm5gestrndM4UGv2fSL/WLz6GRQg665m59vMzhcAcex lMcz2sXkCflmnDVHu4OHJ/HQ+B4yq2NG4GFBYZKtS2hsff0u+mbDgiK7a77q90gMzK4Rbi8UwGkTd BtrHVp0pqQrZ22N0cCjmYjBCCQ4peV7stcq8POpmgR1fGtKXnuZmQtXDrIdC0C6jRSF1kxm+TARNA oe280k/6Q==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:62881 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1lMHag-003piP-0N; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 17:51:06 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AFA191AD-FC1F-4994-9D5E-24EF45A63972"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <42A7F71C-48C6-4DDB-94B8-0AF2CD3A5830@strayalpha.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 14:50:59 -0700
Cc: Last Call <last-call@ietf.org>, gen-art@ietf.org, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis.all@ietf.org
Message-Id: <4CEF2136-2C17-4C43-B7BE-E8A95DBDBA3E@strayalpha.com>
References: <161376065979.10659.16021515616726523967@ietfa.amsl.com> <C049B972-6362-486B-B3A9-363D3EDC1438@strayalpha.com> <fdea7974-9029-47f7-871e-f507943ab808@tenghardt.net> <42A7F71C-48C6-4DDB-94B8-0AF2CD3A5830@strayalpha.com>
To: Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/3bPWpuziU0SiLWjaWCr9iNX1VH0>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-09
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 21:51:09 -0000

Hi, Theresa,

FYI - v10 just posted.

Please let me know if this update needs further adjusting.

Joe

> On Mar 15, 2021, at 11:25 PM, Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:
> 
> FWIW, an update is coming soon. Regarding one point below:
> 
>> On Mar 3, 2021, at 6:28 PM, Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net <mailto:ietf@tenghardt.net>> wrote:
>> 
>>>> For a better overview, maybe it would help if these discussion
>>>> points/considerations were grouped by the TCB value being discussed, and
>>>> possibly provided as a list?
>>> This is a useful idea; we’ll see what we can do in the next update.
> 
> Upon examination, this doesn’t appear easily possible, as there are different sets of options discussed in each paragraph and the sets overlap.
> 
> Joe

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email