IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-eggert-tcpm-rfc8312bis-02

"Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Fri, 26 February 2021 03:10 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5575A3A16B4; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:10:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l_xVt7dVTgEt; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:10:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 545BA3A16BA; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:10:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 11Q3Aewc028379; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net)
Received: (from ietf@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 11Q3AeAJ028378; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ietf)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-Id: <202102260310.11Q3AeAJ028378@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <AAC7444C-D68D-4BC3-897C-8E88554949AF@fh-muenster.de>
To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:10:40 -0800 (PST)
CC: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, draft-eggert-tcpm-rfc8312bis@ietf.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/3eASZKrA2JrUXIw82N7NT2j3On0>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Request for feedback on WG adoption of draft-eggert-tcpm-rfc8312bis-02
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 03:10:48 -0000

> Dear all,
> 
> this mail starts a two week WG adoption call for
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-eggert-tcpm-rfc8312bis-02
> The intended status would be PS.
> 
> So I would like to solicit feedback regarding support for or objections against the
> adoption of the document as a WG document in TCPM, if it hasn't been already sent to
> the list.
> 
> Please provide feedback before March 11th.

I would like to see this work adopted and support the upgrading of CUBIC from
Experimental to Proposed Standard.

Regards,
Rod

> Best regards
> Michael

> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email