IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] poll for adoption of SACK recovery entry drafty

"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> Tue, 01 September 2009 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AAD28C95D for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.49
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.49 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.109, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8YkhtcIUaebO for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E166728C877 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.102]) by ndjsnpf03.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631FD2D81E6 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:30:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ndjshub04.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub04.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.4.163]) by ndjsppt03.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n81JU6ET018612 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:30:06 -0500
Received: from NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.166]) by ndjshub04.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.163]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:30:06 -0500
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[Verizon]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:30:05 -0500
Thread-Topic: poll for adoption of SACK recovery entry drafty
Thread-Index: AcorOpvGbikE1nfUR9yr7N3CeSSLzg==
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB479B8A30D4@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.7400:2.4.4, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-09-01_14:2009-08-26, 2009-09-01, 2009-09-01 signatures=0
Subject: [tcpm] poll for adoption of SACK recovery entry drafty
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:30:18 -0000

Hello, the authors of the SACK Recovery Entry draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jarvinen-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-01
have given a couple presentations to the WG now and asked if it
could be considered as an item for the WG for Proposed Standard (at
least I'm assuming PS because the I-D says "Intended Status: Standards
Track" ...).  If I'm not mistaken, there has been some positive feedback
on the most recent incarnation, though not a lot, and not really any
negative feedback that I could see.

As chairs, David and I are asking the WG to voice whether we should:

A) adopt this as a WG item for Proposed Standard
B) NOT adopt this as a WG item
C) wait to decide (not ready)

Please let us know what you think.

---------------------------
Wes Eddy
Network & Systems Architect
Verizon FNS / NASA GRC
Office: (216) 433-6682
---------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email