Re: [tcpm] intended status of UTO

Alfred Hönes <ah@tr-sys.de> Wed, 05 November 2008 12:52 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA173A67B5; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:52:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500FD3A67B5 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:52:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.001
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.750, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kJp0hJeS5Cxg for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:52:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from WOTAN.TR-Sys.de (gateway.tr-sys.de [213.178.172.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8809B3A677E for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 04:52:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ZEUS.TR-Sys.de by w. with ESMTP ($Revision: 1.37.109.26 $/16.3) id AA102969488; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 13:51:28 +0100
Received: (from ah@localhost) by z.TR-Sys.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183)/8.7.3) id NAA01027; Wed, 5 Nov 2008 13:51:23 +0100 (MEZ)
From: Alfred Hönes <ah@tr-sys.de>
Message-Id: <200811051251.NAA01027@TR-Sys.de>
To: tcpm@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:51:22 +0100
X-Mailer: ELM [$Revision: 1.17.214.3 $]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tcpm] intended status of UTO
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

Folks,

Since all the draft versions included

 "Intended status: Standards Track"

since more than 24 months without interruption, and this time
span included the WGLC period -- without complaints coming even
far close to WG consensus --, changing this aim *now* would not
make sense for me, unless strong new arguments can be shown up.

Don't forget:  This WG is chartered to maintenance and
minor extensions of TCP.  As this draft closes a gap in
existing specifications, it does precisely that, and it
should aim at an appropriate level on the Standards Track.

For all these reasons, I strongly support *not changing*
the intended status now.

Kind regards,
  Alfred.

-- 

+------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
| TR-Sys Alfred Hoenes   |  Alfred Hoenes   Dipl.-Math., Dipl.-Phys.  |
| Gerlinger Strasse 12   |  Phone: (+49)7156/9635-0, Fax: -18         |
| D-71254  Ditzingen     |  E-Mail:  ah@TR-Sys.de                     |
+------------------------+--------------------------------------------+

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm