Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-04.txt

gc355804@ohio.edu Thu, 04 March 2010 05:32 UTC

Return-Path: <gc355804@ohio.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDD328C224 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:32:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AO8Zk2vtXPEV for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:32:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.oit.ohio.edu (mx4.oit.ohio.edu [132.235.250.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8946428C21E for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:32:40 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAGLUjkuE6wiY/2dsb2JhbACcBqh0DoR3iFqCXYIfBIMX
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,579,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="31643636"
Received: from lb-780.oit.ohio.edu (HELO webmail.ohio.edu) ([132.235.8.152]) by smtpout4.oit.ohio.edu with ESMTP; 04 Mar 2010 00:32:41 -0500
Received: from webmail03.app.private (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by webmail.ohio.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o245WfUo012125; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:32:41 -0500
Received: (from nobody@localhost) by webmail03.app.private (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id o245WbF7012111; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:32:37 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: webmail03.app.private: nobody set sender to gc355804@ohio.edu using -f
To: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:32:37 -0500
From: gc355804@ohio.edu
Message-ID: <1267680757.4b8f45f5be781@login.webmail.ohio.edu>
References: <20100304030003.AC9F828C4E4@core3.amsl.com> <4B8F2652.1010300@gont.com.ar>
In-Reply-To: <4B8F2652.1010300@gont.com.ar>
X-Mailer: Webmail v1.1.10-1.1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: 24.208.182.226
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-04.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:32:46 -0000

Question re: section 6 of this document -- would it be better to remove some of
the emphasis from SO_OOBINLINE and put it on the "urgent data" part?  For example:


Even though applications SHOULD NOT employ the urgent mechanism, applications
which still decide to do so MUST ensure that all "urgent data" is delivered
inline (e.g. set the SO_OOBINLINE socket option on platforms that support it),
as intended by the IETF specifications.


The above text also probably also makes the suggestion there a bit stronger, for
better or worse.

Best,
Gilbert Clark
Grad Student

Quoting Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>:

> Hi, all,
> 
> I've posted a rev of the urgent-data I-D, with all the suggesdted
> changes (modulo the data/datum one, that just wanted to double-check
> with David (and that there's still plenty of time to fix, if
> needed)).
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Kind regards,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor
> Extensions Working Group of the IETF.
> > 
> > 
> > 	Title           : On the implementation of the TCP urgent
> mechanism
> > 	Author(s)       : F. Gont, A. Yourtchenko
> > 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-04.txt
> > 	Pages           : 13
> > 	Date            : 2010-03-03
> > 
> > This document analyzes how current TCP implementations process TCP
> > urgent indications, and how the behavior of some widely-deployed
> > middle-boxes affect how urgent indications are processed by end
> > systems.  This document updates the relevant specifications such
> that
> > they accommodate current practice in processing TCP urgent
> > indications, provides advice to applications that make use of the
> > urgent mechanism, and raises awareness about the reliability of
> TCP
> > urgent indications in the current Internet.
> > 
> > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> >
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-04.txt
> > 
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> > 
> > Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
> > implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the
> > Internet-Draft.
> > 
> > 
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > tcpm mailing list
> > tcpm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> 
> -- 
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>