IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard

Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Mon, 25 May 2009 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9192E3A6B7C for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2009 08:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10e6cxnXf9SY for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 May 2009 08:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f164.google.com (mail-gx0-f164.google.com [209.85.217.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27893A67F4 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 May 2009 08:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so420323gxk.13 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 May 2009 08:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=43b8UqSqAesTQOrtp7EwJtYojRv1n1uoRDc2OprDriY=; b=A2aR9e+0dClOkWAyHbibr8KKcXCWF8JUWcZDq/ole6gvHhW4pYtXAFjmis4j7XcXuw nQkUyM2yBIZtYdc8sYmGYOvXsjM8P3v1YcqjutMO8AX9a9q21ht2M4T+O+KobSO9J3G9 N1uPNb/bdj3dZ9pIcOdu9MzfE2uXkRRMuMBQs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=MWbK/DHE1g1KcR/afRbMBBtuZeF3yeOFAUY+aJfqhIexfcX+TLXwI4Wz6ejPBuIVD9 zRu6J31NCqf5GLUg8sShWIAulACC2BSPhiCa+BymoOno/TpdnPKXp5SiiXVGMw319eEH gMFVFcvNoef9ws8uq7gCEwd1p2qGussiC/nv8=
Received: by 10.100.166.10 with SMTP id o10mr12807274ane.95.1243265039943; Mon, 25 May 2009 08:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?168.77.196.154? (154.196.lacnicxii.lacnic.net [168.77.196.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d22sm11304079and.5.2009.05.25.08.23.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 25 May 2009 08:23:58 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Fernando Gont <fernando.gont.netbook.win@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4A1AB804.1070902@gont.com.ar>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:23:48 -0300
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
References: <20090402150706.EC83D28C222@core3.amsl.com> <29AE22C3-F03F-48A8-B335-A7C8E0265406@nokia.com> <53AC2432-4B39-46FD-8414-F29EC648066C@nokia.com> <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58074EEA6E@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com> <4A172044.2050103@gont.com.ar> <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58074EEDE0@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58074EEDE0@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure (Improving TCP's Robustness to Blind In-Window Attacks) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:22:22 -0000

Hello, Anantha,


>     I will summarize all the comments which have been incorporated when
> I post the next revision. I have no issues trying out the <?rfc
> iprnotified="yes"?> suggestion by Brian. 

Great!


> My email to Lars was primarily
> to say that "there have been discussions about the comments and the next
> revision is work in progress"
>     Does that clarify?

Sure it does. I was just wondering what had been the outcome of the
e-mails discussion.

We had also had a brief discussion on more technical stuff. But I'm not
sure if there are any changes that will be incorporated in the next rev
in response to that e-mail exchange. Maybe you could post a heads up on
the upcoming changes?

Thanks!

Kind regards,
-- 
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email