[tcpm] Increasing ICW

Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com> Tue, 23 March 2010 21:38 UTC

Return-Path: <muraris@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3A43A6946 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.300, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gxM50DbjufkS for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (maila.microsoft.com [131.107.115.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2CA3A68DC for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14CASC132.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.52.17) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:38:38 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC128.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.7.44]) by TK5EX14CASC132.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.52.17]) with mapi; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:38:37 -0700
From: Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "iccrg@cs.ucl.ac.uk" <iccrg@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Thread-Topic: Increasing ICW
Thread-Index: AQHKytExWNOSVn3gF0CmWjqzyVkYTw==
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:38:29 +0000
Message-ID: <03520536067DF14395EA93FE7ECFDCF029138C6B@TK5EX14MBXC128.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <03520536067DF14395EA93FE7ECFDCF029138215@TK5EX14MBXC128.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <03520536067DF14395EA93FE7ECFDCF029138215@TK5EX14MBXC128.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_03520536067DF14395EA93FE7ECFDCF029138C6BTK5EX14MBXC128r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Jitu Padhye <padhye@microsoft.com>, Dave Maltz <dmaltz@microsoft.com>, Albert Greenberg <albert@microsoft.com>
Subject: [tcpm] Increasing ICW
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 21:38:19 -0000

Changed the title so we can continue discussion from the meeting. Below link describes the approaches we are taking to make the web faster. There are two sets of changes one primarily for the intra-datacenter flows and the other for WAN transfers. The latter work is toying with the idea of increasing ICW.
  A lot of people voiced very valid concerns. We are also very concerned that there may be pockets of the Internet where a large ICW burst can be problematic. However as I mentioned today    morning we should make a data driven decision. We have been experimenting and we will share our results as well.
This is an important discussion to have in tcpm, whether or not the current draft should be adopted by the WG should be debated in the coming meetings. I think we need to consider this being a application driven socket option instead of a global setting.
Thanks
Murari


From: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcpm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Murari Sridharan
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 11:25 AM
To: tcpm@ietf.org; iccrg@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Cc: Matt Mathis; Jitu Padhye; Dave Maltz; Albert Greenberg
Subject: [tcpm] Cloud faster

To follow up on what I mentioned at the mike, here is the work we have been doing and we can help collect data here.

http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/cloudfaster/

Thanks