Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2269)
Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Fri, 21 May 2010 08:29 UTC
Return-Path: <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 5D60E3A6D39 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 21 May 2010 01:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.244
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.244 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.355,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zAY5tSkTbKlU for
<tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 May 2010 01:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587943A7F50 for <tcpm@ietf.org>;
Thu, 20 May 2010 22:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh106.ntc.nokia.com
[172.21.138.213]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with
ESMTP id o4L5wAmO017552; Fri, 21 May 2010 00:58:22 -0500
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by
esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Fri, 21 May 2010 08:58:07 +0300
Received: from mgw-sa01.ext.nokia.com ([147.243.1.47]) by
esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft
SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 21 May 2010 08:58:07 +0300
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (esdhcp030222.research.nokia.com
[172.21.30.222]) by mgw-sa01.ext.nokia.com (Switch-3.3.3/Switch-3.3.3) with
ESMTP id o4L5w67s001019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 May 2010 08:58:06 +0300
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at fit.nokia.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-25--238469446;
protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E633C72B@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 08:57:53 +0300
Message-Id: <3DD98545-6C59-489B-957F-C97B87B32FF7@nokia.com>
References: <20100518162738.29C0AE065C@rfc-editor.org>
<C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47E633C72B@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
To: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 May 2010 05:58:07.0096 (UTC)
FILETIME=[9591A780:01CAF8AA]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: "nmalykh@protocols.ru" <nmalykh@protocols.ru>,
"tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2269)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>,
<mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>,
<mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 08:29:25 -0000
It looks like we have consensus. I rejected the errata. Thanks for the quick resolution. Lars On 2010-5-18, at 20:02, Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP] wrote: > I think this errata should be rejected, as 3042 behavior > is referenced as a SHOULD on page 9, when implementing > fast retransmit + fast recovery, and this material is > new for 5681 (it was not part of 2581), but I think we > need to discuss this on the TCPM list and let our ADs > know how to handle it. > > -- > Wes Eddy > MTI Systems > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 12:28 PM >> To: mallman@icir.org; vern@icir.org; eblanton@cs.purdue.edu; >> ietfdbh@comcast.net; lars.eggert@nokia.com; weddy@grc.nasa.gov; >> david.borman@windriver.com >> Cc: nmalykh@protocols.ru; tcpm@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2269) >> >> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5681, >> "TCP Congestion Control". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5681&eid=2269 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <nmalykh@protocols.ru> >> >> Section: 7 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> The description of fast retransmit and fast recovery has been >> clarified, and the use of Limited Transmit [RFC3042] is now >> recommended. >> >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> The description of fast retransmit and fast recovery has been >> clarified. >> >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Really using of Limited Transmit [RFC3042] is not recommended anywhere >> in RFC 5681. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC5681 (draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc2581bis-07) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : TCP Congestion Control >> Publication Date : September 2009 >> Author(s) : M. Allman, V. Paxson, E. Blanton >> Category : DRAFT STANDARD >> Source : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions >> Area : Transport >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG
- Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2… Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
- [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2269) RFC Errata System
- Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2… Mark Allman
- Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tcpm] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5681 (2… Vern Paxson