Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt
Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar> Thu, 05 March 2009 17:20 UTC
Return-Path: <fernando@gont.com.ar>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903C028C465 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:20:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.923
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.923 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.676, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6vq8in7lGuCf for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:20:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.xmundo.net (smtp1.xmundo.net [201.216.232.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2E028C44A for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:20:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from venus.xmundo.net (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]) by smtp1.xmundo.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953186B6A27; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:21:03 -0300 (ART)
Received: from [192.168.0.151] (235-131-17-190.fibertel.com.ar [190.17.131.235]) (authenticated bits=0) by venus.xmundo.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n25HKgxk020910; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:20:44 -0200
Message-ID: <49B009F7.2060400@gont.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:20:55 -0200
From: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>
References: <20090304233001.4766928C39E@core3.amsl.com> <EA1E2361-E42F-460F-AC7E-E7161FACD899@windriver.com>
In-Reply-To: <EA1E2361-E42F-460F-AC7E-E7161FACD899@windriver.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
OpenPGP: id=D076FFF1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (venus.xmundo.net [201.216.232.56]); Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:20:59 -0300 (ART)
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:20:34 -0000
Hello, David, > I've just posted a new revision of 1323bis. I've tried to incorporate > all the things from the Philadelphia meeting, including adding a real > Security Considerations section. Some of my notes were a bit cryptic, > as were the TCPM Meeting Minutes, so I've probably missed some things > there. There is a fairly lengthy discussion of the security implications of TCP timestamps and large windows in the document I authored for UK CPNI (available at http://www.gont.com.ar/papers) This document has also resulted in an IETF I-D (draft-gont-tcp-security-00.txt). So I guess that a small excerpt of what is there, and a pointer, would complete the security considerations section of rfc1323bis. Thanks! Kind regards, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.… David Borman
- [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt Internet-Drafts
- Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.… Fernando Gont