Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO - Working session to close open issues?

"Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 26 July 2009 12:07 UTC

Return-Path: <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BEEF28C135 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xTDMIe4e8oAM for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f194.google.com (mail-px0-f194.google.com [209.85.216.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99A428C12B for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi32 with SMTP id 32so1189474pxi.29 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:x-mailer:date:to :from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; bh=/ulo6EGqFRC0GgPDjg2MQzIRK8C067+f5fcWe0s+nt8=; b=tcJ1X38Jk88Jm5d7AJNjWEYl3FFmeW+vW37mG+KkPAydlKpo3r3gHQVit8jl5ahX/V fAOH+MJIBniFl8u/+JPzeWhp6/GNX0BZbiff0lpLWj2FgfpHHXDxNSJ879TvWjW8hmYH YQiO7PUFaXYSfZ3CtG6xLaG6FPwmxCZt+VgVQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:x-mailer:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; b=kB6eEWBy31biCuwfUhZ0ZDgPQ5Av7wddybXJebn5juSmVZ9c6A5Z8XukDw0dUPwSo2 Qs5rSkxN6r++28LA+ykL1LZJauWIh3tUZyqWVApOydgXdlWQ9uNNs8C9VBiPsb7SC3+m HdFeXLVkGKEBoxbo4CuZYlf5J0Z7p2L1bUN58=
Received: by 10.115.107.12 with SMTP id j12mr7872821wam.94.1248610070232; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Gregory-T60.gmail.com (nat-service4.juniper.net [66.129.225.151]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n9sm11003776wag.23.2009.07.26.05.07.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:07:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4a6c4715.09d7720a.29ab.ffffa37b@mx.google.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:07:42 -0700
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
From: "Gregory M. Lebovitz" <gregory.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1780C440-658E-43AE-A3E0-CEA1573B34FE@isi.edu>
References: <4a6b93bc.1ed6720a.33e5.0661@mx.google.com> <1780C440-658E-43AE-A3E0-CEA1573B34FE@isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>, Wesley Eddy <weddy@grc.nasa.gov>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO - Working session to close open issues?
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 12:07:51 -0000

At 10:30 PM 7/25/2009, Joe Touch wrote:
>Please see the current doc - there are no open issues I am aware of
>except NAT support, which can be closed during the WG mtg.

Hey Joe.
It was while reading draft-05 that I wrote my email. Here are the 
things I'd like to work through, just to be sure we have closure:
  - step by step through rolling from one key to a new key
  - step by step through the removal of a key
  - step by step through the matching overlap problem
  - clarity on KDF / HMAC language
  - clarify the current crypto issue with variable length MasterKeys 
and AES-128-CMAC

If tonight won't work, when, even if it's after the meeting another day?
Gregory

>I can meet
>after the WG only, fwiw.
>
>Joe
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Jul 26, 2009, at 12:26 AM, "Gregory M. Lebovitz" 
><gregory.ietf@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>>Hey guys,
>>In the spirit of trying to get to working group last call asap, what
>>do you think about having a working session on Sunday evening or
>>monday to try to close out some of the open items on TCP-AO BEFORE
>>our monday 17:40 TCPM session?
>>
>>Do any of the following work?
>>- Sunday 21:00 - 23:00
>>- Monday 15:10 - 17:30
>>
>>If we can't get together before the TCPM mtg on Monday, how about we
>>get a quick bite together on Monday after the meeting, and then
>>spend a bit of time together on the document's open issues?
>>
>>(note: EKR's not here this week.)
>>
>>Gregory.
>>
>>
>>Gregory.
>>
>>+++++++++++++++++++++++
>>IETF-related email from
>>Gregory M. Lebovitz
>>Juniper Networks
>>g r e go r  y d o t  i e tf a t  g m a i l  do t c o  m