IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Progressing draft-ietf-tcpm-converters

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 28 May 2019 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665EF1200D6 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2019 13:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id THaQw6ehvTtj for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 May 2019 13:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094CD1200CC for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 May 2019 13:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=jNcOecDvXfvi+M5Ts1QvI/Sish+lEjBqn8AajCf07qA=; b=QKycFlJfsYtjFud40LukxrrjP XXkaZr2dsFbeeRDx/FvV10T3X2DzrjdLkhWwtaVoECKidq6KQlltwvt7QjutE/djOdTcz+CMwUH67 ciDfSN2Hvt4lHI6DaDTUjiwJouOwxBPnyo7TmUW9tdQHdLZTiKYE3OkHe+IFTeavjPWT5Savn31Us JkJqJwHVf273N84EO4btHFOkVv7lvV62GUni9NTKJgZmcLrENIXGWYc69x0TMMGYmIqAwIugjUaO3 ZPu+xeC87sMeZfX0nIjevuCVrHY9KiNQEPt8EwSSM4/Di0bSkhLpiBLpAXGeX9eAoNkxTBvZxavlB 09zZ8tEOw==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:50014 helo=[192.168.1.179]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1hViKF-0030S4-40; Tue, 28 May 2019 16:04:03 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16F203)
In-Reply-To: <CAK6E8=cMEPW9Qv_tTuCW42uZOPLBVr2qNutC7EjbRTtWMRr8kA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 13:03:58 -0700
Cc: Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <330FD553-AB92-48EC-84AF-21A525CD1949@strayalpha.com>
References: <F92BF1E2-60EB-4E48-84A4-1C82589A056A@tessares.net> <CAK6E8=f-TAUWs3x4P9XHUHbvRhOqBhH9GU910Yoy5v_0vzUxAQ@mail.gmail.com> <A0496204-331F-4D8E-A1C1-83D3E1CE759B@tessares.net> <CAK6E8=e0RVzfRA0j=y8EZK0HonH6vaMBL6m-U3L+8cNO-zpqqw@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EA8E8EF@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAK6E8=cDrLB0Oop2act7jCe_CYnNd2gJZU06ZHg_zJXXh_VOXg@mail.gmail.com> <MW2PR2101MB1049E8330D990998817F1A82B6020@MW2PR2101MB1049.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EA8F7C3@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <MW2PR2101MB10493385260DA9D53B92B1A4B61E0@MW2PR2101MB1049.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <CAK6E8=cMEPW9Qv_tTuCW42uZOPLBVr2qNutC7EjbRTtWMRr8kA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/83vJK019fXyGrYU42xkXwhQB5dk>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Progressing draft-ietf-tcpm-converters
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 20:04:06 -0000


On May 28, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

>> What you seem to be asking for is a modification of 793 and/or API behavior which will need a new opt-in socket option for preserving compat for existing applications.
> 
> yes that's my sense as well (i.e. this draft requires a change in RFC793

That’s not trivial and shouldn’t be assumed a viable way forward. 

Joe

v2.20.3 | Report a Bug | By Email