Re: [tcpm] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt

At 06:07 a.m. 03/12/2008, Lars Eggert wrote:

>>I have produced a separate PDF document with such a discussion, and
>>have provided a pointer to it in the Introduction. Please let me know
>>if you think this addresses the issue you raised.
>>
>>WG: Is this okay with the working group, or is any other approach
>>preferred rather than the one I hve taken to adderss David's comments?
>
>Quick follow-up: I have suggested to Fernando the alternative of
>including a short section of text on just this issue in the document
>itself, instead of referencing a PDF that includes a lot of other test
>(the PDF is basically what used to be appendix A, which was removed
>based on WG feedback). But that is also not aligned with prior WG
>consensus, since it would move some text back that we had removed.
>
>Basically, David's comment is asking for some text that WG consensus
>had removed from the document, and we need to come to an agreement on
>whether we want to revisit this consensus and add some text or point
>to another document, or if we want to tell David that he's on the
>rough side of the consensus.

FWIW, my personal take is that adding a reference to that PDF can 
address David's comments without having to add text back to the I-D.

Kind regards,

--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm