IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] Cross-area alignment on "L4S and RACK"

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 06 November 2018 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B311288BD; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:14:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2MkpBZZ9AAVJ; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com (mail-lf1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73556130E19; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id v5so5071236lfe.7; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 14:14:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sKOEuwAABIytkBbF08W6mFqZe/L/PL5OOoi4ZkG2StI=; b=NLZY0/d6bC4V373+fdRmw3GI7e3A75hS4Fssr9cETdzLrvKV/yRP/ttWXG7o9dIUoS RTUdKjvZaMtdpbVbrEBans0W1RY2xsI3/iKeLhuST5ZA1BY/CHIjJjPZGqPOrd5i6hi4 wXd3NtAZOnMO0Vjr6WoStlAg52Q9l2/4FRPUVgwTqWtVC2EhkYmEnIVOn3KTIIKcfAOZ YVXObaa9tjZ0HVqmFI1MRI70qDUaxav1Z3Yalq+3vIs5/xvCMTwhOW6Lqpsiszo2LnMJ AmW5eAh8L0dWCZkc4LfHRyKYOeIf5fxTTbxoX8FIgHCJHh71xurt1jvTEye2bj+MradX Ksiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sKOEuwAABIytkBbF08W6mFqZe/L/PL5OOoi4ZkG2StI=; b=UJVb/3z0tud4HMvI4Q7oPxUcvr+TrOPs9mX+lj3OEDOjIQ7hiF8PQwITwx/WX0hmNc 5nzehIIyBMlOzd1dWVGFhIGqrJSIwlbPM1lHvSZ3X/BQox9WYPs70lIQjti4SCrRu5h3 i3K7cKNalDATphQcRZh6TfL+2B07w9DdMOVP6w5I5veF5oY3jFlOql09uZ7HN0Zsz79t LwN6WeeNZXnXIZfOyeNV1dwigAN2jEVrs2FHqKdLedizvaAaLDLGMQwbDi5DpXcZUw68 QkbjfUHnwQdsbXCiPCCJMTAt/Vmey49mt35tp2LJ6jHHzvoE9LnMknigF7F4rYgwuSxX XACA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIKYSBHttGjs39oM76gYpWXLLfLDdcdoCr22IRViJUSzU4zFpTF ZPMwpAhNWCROVOkowX3s8sgJv8jzfZZp5ejHxewo4bLJ+nM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dnV5U1Z7Ol8T/YnsIg62gaMsOCj0nRvRGvKCvCVRZlnV67vXAdk04IT/T3fr0D1ldIlnck1x7DYZVEAnAQPWQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:4345:: with SMTP id m5mr16092323lfj.142.1541542462905; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 14:14:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D14F3F0@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
In-Reply-To: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2D14F3F0@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 05:14:12 +0700
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-fP0wbQzes3rZ+jGeWG4W5emPzsirD21Nm5EA0+MqKJog@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de
Cc: tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>, tsvwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e864ba057a065209"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/A6sDmvpXhOKPb827ZeAGsq2f344>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] Cross-area alignment on "L4S and RACK"
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 22:14:28 -0000

Michael,

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 2:20 AM Scharf, Michael <
Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de> wrote:

> A comment on the TCPM presentation "L4S and RACK":
>
> As far as I understand, the DETNET WG in RTG area has quite some uses
> cases for ultra-low latency transport - in particular also with bounded
> jitter. And some of these applications (e.g. using UDP) apparently may not
> be able to tolerate *any* out-of-order packet delivery.
>
> So perhaps some cross-area alignment on ulta-low-latency application
> requirements would be useful?
>
> Michael
> (who recently had to review draft-ietf-detnet-architecture)
>

I'm not a responsible AD for DETNET, but we approved
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-use-cases/ within the
last couple of weeks.

My understanding is that at least some of the use cases have that
intolerance for out-of-order delivery (among other characteristics). That
was certainly the case when we chartered DETNET.

I'm sure TSV will do the right thing ;-)

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email