Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] Cross-area alignment on "L4S and RACK"

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <> Tue, 06 November 2018 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B311288BD; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:14:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2MkpBZZ9AAVJ; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73556130E19; Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:14:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id v5so5071236lfe.7; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 14:14:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sKOEuwAABIytkBbF08W6mFqZe/L/PL5OOoi4ZkG2StI=; b=NLZY0/d6bC4V373+fdRmw3GI7e3A75hS4Fssr9cETdzLrvKV/yRP/ttWXG7o9dIUoS RTUdKjvZaMtdpbVbrEBans0W1RY2xsI3/iKeLhuST5ZA1BY/CHIjJjPZGqPOrd5i6hi4 wXd3NtAZOnMO0Vjr6WoStlAg52Q9l2/4FRPUVgwTqWtVC2EhkYmEnIVOn3KTIIKcfAOZ YVXObaa9tjZ0HVqmFI1MRI70qDUaxav1Z3Yalq+3vIs5/xvCMTwhOW6Lqpsiszo2LnMJ AmW5eAh8L0dWCZkc4LfHRyKYOeIf5fxTTbxoX8FIgHCJHh71xurt1jvTEye2bj+MradX Ksiw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sKOEuwAABIytkBbF08W6mFqZe/L/PL5OOoi4ZkG2StI=; b=UJVb/3z0tud4HMvI4Q7oPxUcvr+TrOPs9mX+lj3OEDOjIQ7hiF8PQwITwx/WX0hmNc 5nzehIIyBMlOzd1dWVGFhIGqrJSIwlbPM1lHvSZ3X/BQox9WYPs70lIQjti4SCrRu5h3 i3K7cKNalDATphQcRZh6TfL+2B07w9DdMOVP6w5I5veF5oY3jFlOql09uZ7HN0Zsz79t LwN6WeeNZXnXIZfOyeNV1dwigAN2jEVrs2FHqKdLedizvaAaLDLGMQwbDi5DpXcZUw68 QkbjfUHnwQdsbXCiPCCJMTAt/Vmey49mt35tp2LJ6jHHzvoE9LnMknigF7F4rYgwuSxX XACA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIKYSBHttGjs39oM76gYpWXLLfLDdcdoCr22IRViJUSzU4zFpTF ZPMwpAhNWCROVOkowX3s8sgJv8jzfZZp5ejHxewo4bLJ+nM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5dnV5U1Z7Ol8T/YnsIg62gaMsOCj0nRvRGvKCvCVRZlnV67vXAdk04IT/T3fr0D1ldIlnck1x7DYZVEAnAQPWQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:4345:: with SMTP id m5mr16092323lfj.142.1541542462905; Tue, 06 Nov 2018 14:14:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2018 05:14:12 +0700
Message-ID: <>
Cc: tcpm IETF list <>,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e864ba057a065209"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] [tsvwg] Cross-area alignment on "L4S and RACK"
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 22:14:28 -0000


On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 2:20 AM Scharf, Michael <> wrote:

> A comment on the TCPM presentation "L4S and RACK":
> As far as I understand, the DETNET WG in RTG area has quite some uses
> cases for ultra-low latency transport - in particular also with bounded
> jitter. And some of these applications (e.g. using UDP) apparently may not
> be able to tolerate *any* out-of-order packet delivery.
> So perhaps some cross-area alignment on ulta-low-latency application
> requirements would be useful?
> Michael
> (who recently had to review draft-ietf-detnet-architecture)

I'm not a responsible AD for DETNET, but we approved within the
last couple of weeks.

My understanding is that at least some of the use cases have that
intolerance for out-of-order delivery (among other characteristics). That
was certainly the case when we chartered DETNET.

I'm sure TSV will do the right thing ;-)