Re: [tcpm] Presentation slot requests for IETF 108 (online)

"Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Thu, 02 July 2020 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789723A0C6F; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n54Qkxvw7xiK; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 918A03A0C55; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id 062IKXdJ062066; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:20:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net)
Received: (from ietf@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id 062IKW9I062065; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:20:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ietf)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <ietf@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-Id: <202007021820.062IKW9I062065@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <6EC6417807D9754DA64F3087E2E2E03E2DC85322@rznt8114.rznt.rzdir.fht-esslingen.de>
To: "Scharf, Michael" <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:20:32 -0700 (PDT)
CC: "Markus.Amend@telekom.de" <Markus.Amend@telekom.de>, "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>, "tcpm-chairs@ietf.org" <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/AGxjTvUJOdd4va3_Da-Q58Uinao>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Presentation slot requests for IETF 108 (online)
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 18:21:03 -0000

Michael,
	Shouldnt the datatracker entry in its entierity be moved
to tcpm since tcpm is now taking on the work of the closed mptcp wg?
That way history of the document is preserved and can be easier
to research.

	I am not sure this is even possible, but loosing the
provadence of a document because it moved WG's seems problematic.

Regards,
Rod

> Markus,
> 
> Thanks for the request.
> 
> It may make sense to resubmit the I-D as -tcpm- if it shall be presented in TCPM. Then it shows up in datatracker in the right context.
> 
> Michael
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Markus.Amend@telekom.de <Markus.Amend@telekom.de>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 9:55 AM
> > To: Scharf, Michael <Michael.Scharf@hs-esslingen.de>de>; tcpm@ietf.org
> > Cc: tcpm-chairs@ietf.org; kangjiao@huawei.com
> > Subject: RE: Presentation slot requests for IETF 108 (online)
> > 
> > Dear Michaels, Yoshi
> > 
> > Since MPTCP WG is closed and TCPM takes care, Jiao and I would like to
> > present implementation updates (probably also a new draft version -02) for
> > 
> > * draft-amend-mptcp-robe / "Multipath TCP Robust Session Establishment"
> > * Jiao Kang / Markus Amend
> > * 20min
> > 
> > Just in case we are not able to update the recent -01 to a -02, is it still
> > required to move the -01 to TCPM before #108?
> > 
> > Br
> > 
> > Markus
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: tcpm <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Scharf, Michael
> > Sent: Donnerstag, 2. Juli 2020 09:15
> > To: tcpm@ietf.org
> > Cc: tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
> > Subject: [tcpm] Presentation slot requests for IETF 108 (online)
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Given that we had a pretty packed agenda during the virtual interim meeting,
> > the chairs have asked for two slots during IETF 108. This basically implies that
> > we have again the 2:30 hour slot that TCPM used to have for many years.
> > 
> > According to the draft agenda for IETF 108, TCPM has been scheduled for
> > Monday Session I (1:40) and Monday Session II (0:50).
> > 
> > If you are interested in presenting, please let the chairs know until
> > **Monday 2020-07-13**:
> > 
> > * Draft name / presentation title
> > * Presenter
> > * Total duration (including Q&A)
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > Michael (2x) and Yoshi
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > tcpm mailing list
> > tcpm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
> 

-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org