IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] Proceeding CUBIC draft

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 28 April 2022 08:03 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D4EC159480; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 01:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id We9Mx_2F9qNS; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 01:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C699C157B33; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 01:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id z21so3379695pgj.1; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 01:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Visy+EkfCoe8Bjhi72GaA098TgDaqRyCjWMgMni/zOw=; b=YQns7WnO0Sf0IA2/IrYAv6z+2BC3kwtuWIpMYzmdHp2+N4Fp3eyxUKhel63WrNwJAg SXf+vPEONUXYbiIKt7zkVickAWbG0fj+8ywA+X2XtvgQv7C910J7T09oXf/kHcxRFpV2 cKPlMO7V5RQKeHN8UMJ5uuaXqRiMVUycx5H6f8NBe7fGF2Lp7u97wm2KAC5D+kz2chNO 3Ti4OKTJ7WWiQSY0ieaD/VjVjpHxhcQZRWQIby4pZDg+qdLZwfM/g5rGPWmwHslI3Hdz frzkERKPvVFC1GZydmBOQ2KNBVNi5icEdzIbL6k4mnB/QY1bPaFa2r8/YQ4J7ugSBpZM IHlw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Visy+EkfCoe8Bjhi72GaA098TgDaqRyCjWMgMni/zOw=; b=fEs7a9QuuKqdjSmgXwYcNzD+xGR2r1juPK5+U8vAQj8U4nkpaPnphaGjZZwVH2OEZZ 6o8TOJwQQaubg9wtc708y8g525/930yLj0wD/c902huXeIP8K0GYOaIegLKMsuDuT78c pMfxHjp7Xc9mLnleL4ZvpVOaWVXwIqjUFQBneSuNYEc/xSX7MI9aq9mt+CC/2MVA4JoK BUx28+0VoX26Sd+3AkcFZR71zS0+CkAFj68shyStEf8EyhY3D78cmwMT8OK2JlmcCsY3 pDZl2pBL0Gb31E9wHq7o9N+w0K4HMl4TSUfVXTckWguyVVn2PrN8HSnmMOqB+fmSLr93 Q7Hg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532BGmokb7nDgOK45GeVTJt2QwH7mI0V1yGcJYQTwSSqF4vT5NKe eduiW77LNVXLKvqTVGWyWi0ogmnOJlOByy0sY8Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlb43dArLAJuCKxE5kWthwsyW9Rd9UFPzhf5OGXwXmq+oZPcsACzSXWO/i8dwkSJbnrOx5MYTcJl0r1te72Tc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:816:b0:50d:6b3d:c86f with SMTP id m22-20020a056a00081600b0050d6b3dc86fmr9864363pfk.76.1651132987118; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 01:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAAK044R12B3f+=2mR1ZK15Zkno5n0YvsjGy64LBiBgBN+9n71A@mail.gmail.com> <CAK6E8=fZs--fR+5Rie1NgtrA4cviatVW=Aw+qkeuqstk9DB0Hw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAK044S3RnvbTzOSHR+B26XCFEiT=YbiNGqQUH4zV4T8c9ZfgA@mail.gmail.com> <864B7333-A8EA-4C9F-A4A7-5DAB49AA4245@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <864B7333-A8EA-4C9F-A4A7-5DAB49AA4245@eggert.org>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 01:02:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAK044TGaTBYwDYU=_JC_MEH4u3Ln4T60BFzXJe681cX6eZjpg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>, "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>, tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002c95e805ddb25bf7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/AmA6E2T9jdwIA2LN6uRqMDA3lDk>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Proceeding CUBIC draft
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:03:08 -0000

Hi,
As an option, I am thinking about putting the context for this in the
write-up for the draft in case we don't have proposed texts.
In this way, we can review if the write-up correctly captures the
discussion points. Also, IESG might request to update the draft after
reviewing it.
--
Yoshi


On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 12:06 AM Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 2022-4-19, at 11:27, Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Yes, that will be very helpful. I'd really appreciate If folks who want
> to add something could provide some proposed texts.
>
> I'll just note that we haven't seen any text proposals. *If* people think
> that text should be added, please propose some?
>
> Otherwise we should at some point progress the document as-is.
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email