Re: [tcpm] intended status of UTO

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Tue, 04 November 2008 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703493A6962; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 06:50:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68A33A6962 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 06:50:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.792
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.792 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.807, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cAzQoFkOUabG for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 06:49:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-mx03.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.122.230]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C303A68AC for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 06:49:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh107.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.143]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id mA4Enftp023920; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:49:54 +0200
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:49:40 +0200
Received: from vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.160.244.30]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:49:40 +0200
Received: from mgw-int02.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.97]) by vaebh104.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:49:40 +0200
Received: from esdhcp030110.research.nokia.com (esdhcp030110.research.nokia.com [172.21.30.110]) by mgw-int02.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id mA4EncGq006026; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 16:49:38 +0200
Message-Id: <6C82605A-BCD4-4201-BCF5-7E7D29A18D35@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: "ext Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E706737@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 16:49:37 +0200
References: <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E706737@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Nov 2008 14:49:40.0252 (UTC) FILETIME=[90CDCDC0:01C93E8C]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] intended status of UTO
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2010944488=="
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

For the record, I don't care whether it goes PS or Exp.

Lars (as an author)

On 2008-11-4, at 16:36, ext Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:

> Although UTO has finished last-call and been submitted
> for publication, Magnus has noted that there seemed to
> be a question during last call about its intended status
> that wasn't conclusively resolved.
>
> Our ADs would like to make sure that there isn't going
> to be a problem with publishing this as proposed standard,
> and need the WG's feedback in order to advance the document.
>
> By my homework, the charter item for UTO was written for
> a proposed standard.  When I checked the archives, it
> looked like Pasi was the only WGLC commenter that argued
> for experimental, and on the other hand, Joe, Mark,
> Caitlin, and Toby all seemed to support it as proposed
> standard.  Versions 04 through 09 of the draft include
> "Intended status: Standards Track".
>
> However, in the IETF 68 minutes, I found this:
>  * Lars and chairs did not remember if this is going for experimental
> or
>    proposed. Tim Shepard has preference for experimental.
>    - Tim Shepherd: in San Diego asked this explicitly from chairs
> during
>      agenda bashing, they said the plan is for Experimental.
>    - Lars: ok
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list
> tcpm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm