Re: [tcpm] WGLC: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-10.txt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes - thanks for catching that Fernando!

Joe

Fernando Gont wrote:
> At 02:40 p.m. 21/08/2008, David Borman wrote:
> 
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpsecure-10.txt
>>
>> It is our understanding that all the feedback has been incorporated
>> into this latest version and that there are no known outstanding
>> issues with this document.
>>
>> Please send feedback to the list, even if it is just a "yes, go ahead
>> and publish".
> 
> It had been raised by Joe already that the draft should include a
> reference to the port randomization draft:
> http://www.gont.com.ar/drafts/port-randomization/draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-randomization-01.txt
> . Considering the type of attacks the tcpsecure draft aims to mitigate,
> it is clear that port randomization should be taken into account. And
> given that this is a TSVWG WG item, I think tcpsecure should mention
> port randomization, and include a reference to the port randomization
> draft.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> -- 
> Fernando Gont
> e-mail: fernando@gont.com.ar || fgont@acm.org
> PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAki3JocACgkQE5f5cImnZrv6sACg3Gex3hjhl0BHWqAC9zh35ns+
e34An0y9qefM6WIy5MN8kVQYGZBtc7cF
=r16o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm