[tcpm] Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors-08: (with COMMENT)

[Erik Kline via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Erik Kline has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tcpm-ao-test-vectors/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

[S3.1, etc.; nit]

* I'm somewhat surprised that IETF standard documentation prefixes aren't
  being used (192.0.2.0/24, 2001:db8::/32).

  I do not feel strongly enough, however, to suggest that the examples need
  to be rewritten and the values recomputed.

[S3.1.4; nit]

* If these examples are typical of BGP sessions and GSTM (RFC 5082) is
  a typical BGP deployment practice I would have expected to see the IPv6
  hop limit in use also be 255, rather than 64.

  Again: no need to redo all the examples.