Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc2581bis-06.txt

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Mon, 27 July 2009 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B257628C213 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QWH6YYXgM-Vs for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D8F3A6802 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.176.38] (c1-vpn8.isi.edu [128.9.176.38]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6RCu3U2008162; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A6DA3E3.1080607@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:56:03 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tcpm@ietf.org
References: <20090727121501.A82233A68FC@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090727121501.A82233A68FC@core3.amsl.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Subject: Re: [tcpm] I-D Action:draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc2581bis-06.txt
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:56:22 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi, all,

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group of the IETF.
> 
> 
> 	Title           : TCP Congestion Control
> 	Author(s)       : M. Allman, et al.
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc2581bis-06.txt
> 	Pages           : 17
> 	Date            : 2009-07-27
> 
> This document defines TCP's four intertwined congestion control
>  algorithms: slow start, congestion avoidance, fast retransmit, and
>  fast recovery.  In addition, the document specifies how TCP should
>  begin transmission after a relatively long idle period, as well as
>  discussing various acknowledgment generation methods.  This document
>  obsoletes RFC 2581.

FWIW, regarding the discussion of the long idle period:

The algorithm used is based on a footnote in the appendix of an
unpublished extension of Van's 1988 Sigcomm paper. Amy Hughes, John
Heidemann, and I noted this a few years ago on this list in the
following I-D:
http://www.isi.edu/touch/pubs/draft-hughes-restart-00.txt

Here is a link to the 1988 Sigcomm paper:
http://www.acm.org/pubs/articles/proceedings/comm/52324/p314-jacobson/p314-jacobson.pdf

The Sigcomm version was only 16 pages long. The word "idle" does not
appear anywhere in it.

FWIW, see also our I-D for a few ways to deal with the issue. The
problem is really that the sender is accumulating permission to burst,
which just using a timer cannot address.

Joe



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkpto+MACgkQE5f5cImnZrtdUACg9VSBT9UVxOpA6ciJoDF/C7K1
5SUAn32ZTJmCC8uCNIPtwiTwvBfUma9x
=cKug
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----