IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack

Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de> Sun, 10 November 2019 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E778C120118 for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:16:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lmGntCKmoeCb for <tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from drew.franken.de (mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3EBB12010D for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:16:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mb.fritz.box (ip4d16e760.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [77.22.231.96]) (Authenticated sender: lurchi) by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F14F572106C16 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 20:16:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Message-Id: <903982D2-36DE-428D-A7C5-D3C389C95E9A@lurchi.franken.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 20:16:52 +0100
To: "tcpm@ietf.org Extensions" <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/CU7ck4Ab4NJiL5TwQX-eCCWzQ0A>
Subject: [tcpm] Intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 19:17:00 -0000

Dear all,

the current intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack is experimental.

The authors have indicated that they think the ID is ready for WG LC.
Before starting that, I would like to bring up the question of the
intended status of draft-ietf-tcpm-rack.

Due to the fact that there are at least two independent implementations,
there has been substantial testing and also deployment, I would like
to ask the working group, if PS is a more appropriate intended status.

Any preferences or opinions?

Best regards
Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email