RE: [tcpm] TCP zero window timeout?

"Mahdavi, Jamshid" <jamshid.mahdavi@bluecoat.com> Fri, 21 July 2006 16:32 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3xvH-00058o-3o; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:32:19 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3xvE-000567-ES for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:32:16 -0400
Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com ([216.52.23.28]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G3xnZ-0003ih-3y for tcpm@ietf.org; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:24:24 -0400
Received: from bcs-mail2.internal.cacheflow.com (bcs-mail2.internal.cacheflow.com [10.2.2.59]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.6/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k6LGOJbF022051 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [tcpm] TCP zero window timeout?
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 09:24:13 -0700
Message-ID: <D87D0DFD1BEB364D8E528F28527DD6130240571D@bcs-mail2.internal.cacheflow.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [tcpm] TCP zero window timeout?
Thread-Index: Acas3smHvUvz1eaCTge7psQ7U08oQgAAtvVw
From: "Mahdavi, Jamshid" <jamshid.mahdavi@bluecoat.com>
To: <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.55 on 216.52.23.28
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org


What is the status of draft-eggert-tcpm-tcp-abort-timeout-option-01?  It
may be of some use in situations like this.  I've recently seen another
scenario where this would be useful, so I'd be interested in seeing that
draft reposted...

--Jamshid

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm