Re: [tcpm] Concluding CUBIC draft (chairs' views)

[Markku Kojo <[e-mail]>]

Hi Yoshi,

On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, Yoshifumi Nishida wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> The chairs had discussed how we can proceed and finalize the cubic draft. Here's our current views. We would
> like to proceed with the draft along with them if this looks reasonable to people.
> 
> 1. The current consensus of the WG is still publishing the doc as a PS.
> 
> 2. If we want to hold the publication, there must be solid evidence for the risks in the draft. Otherwise, we
> will proceed with publishing the doc.
> 
> 3. If some people think the current draft needs more explanations or hides some facts, please propose some
> texts. It will be included in the draft once the WG agrees.


I'll propose some text to address/fix some of the issues.

Thanks,

/Markku

> 4. In any case, the chairs will try to capture the discussion points in the write-up for the draft in case
> further discussions are required. 
>     (it will be based on https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/Gxiy6iW6vl7bvhIWLwr72OUW6fI/ , but there
> will be editorial and minor changes)
> 
> If you have any comments, complaints, suggestions or else, please let us know. Especially when you disagree
> with them.
> 
> Thanks,
> --
> Yoshi on behalf of tcpm co-chairs
> 
>