From nobody Mon Mar 15 23:26:19 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EF73A1BA3; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:26:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.281 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.281 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HAS_X_OUTGOING_SPAM_STAT=2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kWW9L6fRoENE; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:26:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ED1F3A1BA2; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:26:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GRcVRaTnRfM1uYtW5rj9L7Xl12jbyZihYghv9FV1zPU=; b=o7eEqG/P0pyw2ju2pvzbg2BfF QWeoE+VmyehMNJDN8hH6/A2WUxdHFR/3XEHMS6mu5EMwpL4jxHX2s1haqtN7iY1ztUCKTePqV040w UOyss2k/dVGKZVRnryA20tInaRwOBIy4UVLOEZ1P54Dlaa9M5HRuPLlVfRO57kxvit/NbwVupMGnE U6XUjjYeQKJ6UBA2PxHnFHiyBRiqpY+RobNQijBalkKNb5ggePXwkn05dwSq9uNoNdHQknYIvw/qE v99jl0NGOJdJn+V9240BrzkZHtRAF9hdZnmohyMVEXrXBCE3DRtMBlDBl2JG8QgUgn0g34O63C+JJ nIppz26+A==; Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:64431 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lM39W-002W3V-6B; Tue, 16 Mar 2021 02:26:06 -0400 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A2DAF8D9-21BC-452C-BCF0-D5411583D1F7" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\)) From: Joseph Touch In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 23:25:56 -0700 Cc: Last Call , gen-art@ietf.org, tcpm IETF list , draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis.all@ietf.org Message-Id: <42A7F71C-48C6-4DDB-94B8-0AF2CD3A5830@strayalpha.com> References: <161376065979.10659.16021515616726523967@ietfa.amsl.com> To: Theresa Enghardt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21) X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched Archived-At: Subject: Re: [tcpm] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-09 X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 06:26:09 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A2DAF8D9-21BC-452C-BCF0-D5411583D1F7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 FWIW, an update is coming soon. Regarding one point below: > On Mar 3, 2021, at 6:28 PM, Theresa Enghardt = wrote: >=20 >>> For a better overview, maybe it would help if these discussion >>> points/considerations were grouped by the TCB value being discussed, = and >>> possibly provided as a list? >> This is a useful idea; we=E2=80=99ll see what we can do in the next = update. Upon examination, this doesn=E2=80=99t appear easily possible, as there = are different sets of options discussed in each paragraph and the sets = overlap. Joe= --Apple-Mail=_A2DAF8D9-21BC-452C-BCF0-D5411583D1F7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 FWIW,= an update is coming soon. Regarding one point below:

On Mar 3, 2021, at 6:28 PM, Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> = wrote:

For a better overview, = maybe it would help if these discussion
points/considerations were grouped by the TCB value being = discussed, and
possibly provided as a list?
This is a useful idea; we=E2=80=99ll see what we = can do in the next update.

Upon examination, this doesn=E2=80=99t appear = easily possible, as there are different sets of options discussed in = each paragraph and the sets overlap.

Joe
= --Apple-Mail=_A2DAF8D9-21BC-452C-BCF0-D5411583D1F7--