Re: [tcpm] Re: RFC 1323: Timestamps option

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Wed, 30 May 2007 17:42 UTC

Return-path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtSBy-0001PU-8Q; Wed, 30 May 2007 13:42:38 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtSBw-0001Gx-Ig for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 13:42:36 -0400
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HtSBv-0003we-79 for tcpm@ietf.org; Wed, 30 May 2007 13:42:36 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (70.sub-75-193-101.myvzw.com [75.193.101.70]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l4UHg52t023256; Wed, 30 May 2007 10:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <465DB752.80900@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 10:41:38 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Borman <david.borman@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Re: RFC 1323: Timestamps option
References: <018977E8-C9F4-42E2-A877-95330F65E7D3@windriver.com> <F8F82A2D-A73F-49C1-A1AA-B385214D60DF@windriver.com> <465D54A8.9000100@isi.edu> <811BD121-1A79-45F4-B4E2-173729655CA9@windriver.com>
In-Reply-To: <811BD121-1A79-45F4-B4E2-173729655CA9@windriver.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336
Cc: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG <tcpm@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0254926524=="
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org


David Borman wrote:
...
>> I'm wondering whether there's a case where you could have started
>> sending new TSvals, and you get a new data ACK (and start calculating
>> RTTs), and then a packet comes in out of order (e.g., duplicated or
>> SACK). Could this corrupt the RTT? Could this ever happen?
> 
> Besides being an ACK for new data, it also has to have a TSecr beyond
> the initial timestamp you sent.  By the time both of those things are
> true, you should be into normal RFC-1323 processing.

So two checks for every incoming packet, not just during 'sync', right?
(just checking; that's not obvious to me from the description)

Thanks, BTW,

Joe

-- 
----------------------------------------
Joe Touch
Sr. Network Engineer, USAF TSAT Space Segment

_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm