Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO review comments.

Stefanos Harhalakis <v13@v13.gr> Sat, 23 August 2008 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <tcpm-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tcpm-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-tcpm-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14503A68E4; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41863A67D6 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CE-92vkXWOuC for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D553A6903 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx-av-05.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-06.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m7NCBGll028368; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:11:16 +0300
Received: from MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr (mx-in-04.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.163]) by mx-av-05.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m7NCBFZT021249; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:11:16 +0300
Received: from hell.hell.gr (adsl79-179.lsf.forthnet.gr [79.103.206.179]) by MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m7NCBCgv016769; Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:11:13 +0300
Authentication-Results: MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=v13@v13.gr; spf=neutral
Authentication-Results: MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr header.from=v13@v13.gr; sender-id=neutral
From: Stefanos Harhalakis <v13@v13.gr>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 15:11:09 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9
References: <0C53DCFB700D144284A584F54711EC58058C2FD4@xmb-sjc-21c.amer.cisco.com> <200808101507.35830.v13@v13.gr> <489F9A94.9080205@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <489F9A94.9080205@isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200808231511.09234.v13@v13.gr>
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, "Anantha Ramaiah (ananth)" <ananth@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP-AO review comments.
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tcpm-bounces@ietf.org

Hello again after 12 days,

On Monday 11 August 2008, Joe Touch wrote:
> | that it supports. Since this isn't possible with limited TCP options
> | space and SYN-cookies issues, something different is required
> | (versioning).
> |
> | Do you see another (better) long-term solution?
>
> Overall, since they keys and parameters need to be configured on a
> per-endpoint-pair basis anyway, IMO this sort of handshake ought to
> occur in the KMS, not in TCP. TCP's SYN option space is insufficient to
> contain multiple authentication fields, AFAICT, in addition to the other
> fields currently commonly in use.

  After rereading the draft and rethinking the conversation, I (finally) agree 
with you. Indeed everything is as you stated above. Since by definition any 
handshake will occur out-of-band in KMS, any different behaviour will require 
another KIND.
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm