IETF Logo Mail Archive

[tcpm] WG status update

"Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov> Thu, 18 March 2010 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AF63A67AB for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.676
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.807, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QTJ9MxSBd8p for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndmsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov (ndmsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.0.121]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E883A67B2 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.103]) by ndmsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDDD2607C2 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:09:18 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from ndjshub01.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjshub01-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.160]) by ndjsppt04.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2IK85qm018654 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:09:17 -0500
Received: from NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.4.166]) by ndjshub01.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.1.160]) with mapi; Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:08:47 -0500
From: "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]" <wesley.m.eddy@nasa.gov>
To: "tcpm@ietf.org" <tcpm@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:08:46 -0500
Thread-Topic: WG status update
Thread-Index: AcrG1tC3Xjt+W8WBRw+rnqtKerJx8w==
Message-ID: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47DFC9705F@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2010-03-18_13:2010-02-06, 2010-03-18, 2010-03-18 signatures=0
Subject: [tcpm] WG status update
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:09:13 -0000

Hello TCPM, going into the Anaheim meeting, here's a brief
snapshot of the WG status as we know it.

***Please note that there are two drafts under poll for
becoming WG items, and very few responses have been
received on these.  Any feedback will be useful.***


WG Items Nearing RFC Publication
================================

Early-Retransmit
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-early-rexmt-04.txt
Milestone Target: Experimental in July 2009
Status: In RFC Editor's queue
Action: None in TCPM

ICMP Attacks
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-icmp-attacks-11.txt
Milestone Target: Informational in July 2009
Status: finished IETF LC, with IESG
Action: None in TCPM

TCP Authentication Option
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10.txt
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in April 2009
Status: sent to IESG
Action: None in TCPM; authors resolving IESG issues

TCP Authentication Option Crypto
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-ao-crypto-01.txt
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard with AO spec
Status: sent to IESG
Action: None in TCPM; authors resolving IESG issues



WG Items in WGLC or being revised after WGLC
============================================

Urgent Pointer
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-urgent-data-05.txt
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in January 2010
Status: updated after WGLC
Action: chairs (David) writing PROTO for sending to IESG

MSS Option
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcpmss-02.txt
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
Status: WGLC started 8/19, ended 9/8 (extended)
Action: being updated based on several of the comments (action with D. Borman)
        needs another WGLC after being revised


Active WG Items
===============

1323bis
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-01.txt
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in July 2009
Status: Needs revision
Action: Revise & WGLC (action with D. Borman)

TCP Security
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-security-01.txt
Milestone Target: BCP in August 2010
Status: outline discussion dying off?  content needs work
Action: 00-draft / outline has been under active discussion; but not attained
          very clear consensus
        WG has begun working on recommendations while still looking for a
          possible compromise on outline (action with Fernando Gont)

Long Connectivity Disruptions
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-lcd-00.txt
(need to submit WG version)
Milestone Target: Experimental in October 2010
Status: sumbitted as initial WG document; authors think no real issues are left
Action: need WG to read/discuss; may be close to ready for last call

SACK Entry
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tcpm-sack-recovery-entry-01.txt
Milestone Target: Proposed Standard in October 2010
Action: need WG to read/discuss
        discussion underway of working on this as update to 3517



Documents Under a Poll to Become WG Items
=========================================


Clarification of sender behavior in persist condition.
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ananth-tcpm-persist-01.txt
Status: discussed on mailing list and in face-to-face meetings
        WG poll opened on March 8
Action: Need responses from WG if this is to be supported

Timestamps
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-gont-tcpm-tcp-timestamps-01.txt
Status: discussed on mailing list and at Minneapolis meeting
        WG poll opened on March 8
Action: Need responses from WG if this is to be supported



Other Proposals Not Yet Decided On
==================================

NewReno Modification
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nishida-newreno-modification-01.txt
Action: need WG to read/discuss
        presentation given, document updated, but WG list not yet polled for adoption

AO NAT
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-touch-tcp-ao-nat-00.txt
Action: WG review/discuss issues raised by Eric Rescorla; to be
        considered as a potential update to the AO spec AFTER
        the base AO spec is published

AO Rekeying
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-duan-tcpm-tcp-ao-rekeying-00.txt
Action: WG to discuss (Anaheim & mailing list)

Increasing TCP's Initial Window
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hkchu-tcpm-initcwnd-00
Action: WG to discuss (Anaheim & mailing list)

Computing TCP's Retransmission Timer
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-paxson-tcpm-rfc2988bis-00.txt
Action: WG to discuss (Anaheim & mailing list)


Older & Expired Documents Discussed
===================================

discussions on Rate-Halving
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-mathis-tcp-ratehalving-00.txt
Action: mailing list discussion about the history of this, and whether
        it needs to be revived

Faster Application Handshakes with SYN/ACK Payloads
expired draft-agl-tcpm-sadata-01
Status: expired; not specifically polled for adoption in WG


Documents Not Adopted by WG
===========================

TCP Option for Transparent Middlebox Discovery
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-knutsen-tcpm-middlebox-discovery-03.txt
Status: discussed on mailing list and updated in response
        poll for working group adoption opened on 12/9, responses
          desired by 12/23
        decision not to adopt by WG; IESG may allow publication and
          option number assignment at their discretion, but TCPM does
          not have consensus to do this work



Other WG Activities
===================

Errata Review for legacy TCP RFCs:

RFC0793 (1496)  3.9  	Technical  	Legacy  Yin Shuming  		2008-08-27
RFC0793 (1561) 	3.2 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1562) 	3.3 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1563) 	3.4 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1564) 	3.7 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1565) 	3.8 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1566) 	3.9 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1567) 	3.9 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1568) 	3.9 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1569) 	2.4 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1570) 	2.7 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1571) 	3.1 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11
RFC0793 (1572) 	3.4 	Technical 	Legacy 	Constantin Hagemeier 	2008-10-11


--
Wes Eddy
MTI Systems

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email