Re: [tcpm] Milestones changed for tcpm WG

Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 03 May 2021 06:32 UTC

Return-Path: <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BA43A097A; Sun, 2 May 2021 23:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JeswJ0g8XizJ; Sun, 2 May 2021 23:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0E73A0977; Sun, 2 May 2021 23:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id a18so2958945qtj.10; Sun, 02 May 2021 23:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=K681qfLMUoEujOHRoYHY1q8hCoFjWbIiBXjjZYSJTrE=; b=THVxHZrj+YYSHjOymoYX9E9LIHmwuYTSzrSuzKjunucyDdkhn80Cl2y6yYC9/rxZae Xkvg/neeQfAuMV/y72i3wonViLPfY3QaIzUTjuUeXB1LpF2TSYo6FssyYjXLqFkK2q24 p4dUs/iaJBPs3WZWbuvMbLAbwFMuGkC0xMxcog5OzfvQN/j5d9w53AsUj3vWh7sQPbXz B5SfkPjCGoLULDP5frfdwx7sogUexG/+96pqSPJV8E5FtX50dnOI5M0oLWkk4lqLf2lD 4d3ifKlIgwJ2SLoLXztxhhgEVW44ibEl/iDyrrrPbDaWfV4IaegX796cBaHzXwUYAXAu qi8Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K681qfLMUoEujOHRoYHY1q8hCoFjWbIiBXjjZYSJTrE=; b=USrtn77lGRcETodSbJU6+vsgL7l7wBihBOU4adNbMorSr0r6Ra7RfNFrmwh0ifrCDs IJcdyC8KJV+3LJ6zUi1y0s2O5MLF427vFv8seDLsbrKA3J5Pq7RpVAe+F2WYAtMy66L1 Cv2EkClmUdq6gurXj+61dIRqglVrJ3Ix9fbQLAcfEkS5q8Ls2ukr1pH9xgMFfzQKkVwf 0v6dFGdmtsl2xORvdtgKX5iMyIzDm6++oAF431EMhi5Net6yKNll81ggvfbUxWKSvdm5 bYKI2srzD+6ngMtIkAZk9UIx1Q3Bt6sXIQ8BCx7nlIpTUEV43wh+fOV1QHLxVlUnAHnj c3sw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ZO9W0USWikJMc5N0olWp6mDB3a6UzHbpc8/PiFP7jr7I3oaNH ja8Ul8n4uNUepfNDXYzpkZxLqfNpBFDQ4yiAwpriod9i
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrziG2kiuhBRWuonEE5P9hI6HayolAAtv3gJ7fEfQN3UEnP68b5L65WGzQYj5hvYnxVIv69p7dKPERKMwqCBY=
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5a16:: with SMTP id n22mr15581600qta.103.1620023526362; Sun, 02 May 2021 23:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161296020545.28489.5614088363628035666@ietfa.amsl.com> <043F495B-53A1-491A-906B-DAF6F5369F9E@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <043F495B-53A1-491A-906B-DAF6F5369F9E@strayalpha.com>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nsd.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 23:31:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAK044Sc=pG9u55sJ+ywhTGUTyLR76hP+8VPa=KNSO=CNAM5JQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: tcpm-chairs <tcpm-chairs@ietf.org>, tcpm IETF list <tcpm@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d1117805c1671ea1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/F0bxFGJc7EPtLP1roTho9sKMRGY>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Milestones changed for tcpm WG
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 06:32:13 -0000

Hi Joe,

Thanks for bringing this up again.
In my understanding, there was no clear consensus on the interactions with
TSO yet. Or, have we settled?
I thought you'll update the draft for this.

Thanks,
--
Yoshi

On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 9:30 AM Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> wrote:

> Hi, all,
>
> I believe there are no known pending issues with this draft; it might be
> ready for WGLC.
>
> If so, though, there is a question about the corresponding SYN extension
> option. I would like to submit that as a WG experimental doc at the same
> time, or, if not, to submit it as an individual experimental doc. Either
> way, the docs should be linked in the publication process so they can cite
> each other (even informationally) by RFC number rather than draft name.
>
> Can you let me know how best to proceed?
>
> Thank you,
> Joe
>
> > On Feb 10, 2021, at 4:30 AM, IETF Secretariat <
> ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> > Changed milestone "Submit document on a TCP Extended Data Offset Option
> to
> > the IESG as a Proposed Standard RFC", added draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-edo to
> > milestone.
> >
> > URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/tcpm/about/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tcpm mailing list
> > tcpm@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
>
>