[tcpm] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9293 (8171)

tuexen@fh-muenster.de Thu, 07 November 2024 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
X-Original-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEA5C1CAE70; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 01:39:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4EUbLPhjDge6; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 01:39:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx-out-02.fh-muenster.de (mx-out-02.fh-muenster.de [212.201.120.206]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B652C1CAE7E; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 01:39:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-director-01.fh-muenster.de (mail-director-01.fh-muenster.de [185.149.215.227]) by mx-out-02.fh-muenster.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2ED9E0EC5; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:38:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (dhcp-8e30.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.142.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tuexen) by mail-director-01.fh-muenster.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD3201A0048; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 10:38:42 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.200.121\))
From: tuexen@fh-muenster.de
In-Reply-To: <20241106233032.5866A3B873@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 09:38:41 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9C70F06C-4E4C-4FEF-8F95-985BCE08F62A@fh-muenster.de>
References: <20241106233032.5866A3B873@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.200.121)
Message-ID-Hash: LJ4VUSYA5MIUB62DM7OYU2WWMRE6GNLH
X-Message-ID-Hash: LJ4VUSYA5MIUB62DM7OYU2WWMRE6GNLH
X-MailFrom: tuexen@fh-muenster.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tcpm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: wes@mti-systems.com, tcpm-ads@ietf.org, abbrev@gmail.com, tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [tcpm] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9293 (8171)
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpm/F6DgdIWjjY0qtZGLFnZDmijHX4Q>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tcpm>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tcpm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tcpm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tcpm-leave@ietf.org>

> On 6. Nov 2024, at 23:30, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9293,
> "Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8171
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Christopher Williams <abbrev@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: Appendix B
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>    +-----------------+---------+------+--------+-----+--------+------+
>    | *  Dest Unreach | SHLD-25 |  X   |        |     |        |      |
>    |    (0,1,5) =>   |         |      |        |     |        |      |
>    |    inform ALP   |         |      |        |     |        |      |
>    +-----------------+---------+------+--------+-----+--------+------+
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    +-----------------+---------+------+--------+-----+--------+------+
>    | *  Dest Unreach | SHLD-25 |      |   X    |     |        |      |
>    |    (0,1,5) =>   |         |      |        |     |        |      |
>    |    inform ALP   |         |      |        |     |        |      |
>    +-----------------+---------+------+--------+-----+--------+------+
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> This requirement has an X in the "MUST" column, but the X should be in the "SHOULD" column.
> 
> The relevant text for this requirement is "a TCP implementation ... SHOULD make the information available to the application (SHLD-25)."
The report is correct. The information is correct in RFC 1122, where it comes from.

Best regards
Michael
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it 
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9293 (draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-28)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
> Publication Date    : August 2022
> Author(s)           : W. Eddy, Ed.
> Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
> Source              : TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tcpm mailing list -- tcpm@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tcpm-leave@ietf.org